Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Lekh Ram vs Hpseb Ltd. And Another on 21 September, 2021

Author: Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench: Ajay Mohan Goel

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

                  ON THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021




                                                             .
                                 BEFORE





                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY MOHAN GOEL

    CIVIL ORIGINAL PETITON CONTEMPT (TRIBUNAL) No. 551 of 2020_





    Between:-

    SH. JOGINDER SINGH SON OF SH.





    LEKH RAM, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
    CHAILI, P.O. TAMBOL, TEHSIL NAINA
    DEVI JI, DISTT. BILASPUR, H.P.
    PRESENTLY SERVING AS A T-MATE
    IN HPSEB LTDS. DIVISION BARSAR,

    DISTT. HAMIRPUR, H.P.

                                                    ..........PETITIONER

    (BY MS. BABITA KUMARI, ADVOCATE
    VICE MR. A.K. GUPTA, ADVOCATE)



    AND

    1. MR. R.K. GAUTAM, EXECUTIVE




       DIRECTOR (PERSONNEL), HPSEB
       LTD. WITH HEADQUARTERS AT





       SHIMLA-4.
    2. SHRI PATAN SINGH, EXECUTIVE
       ENGINEER, HPSEB LTD. DIVISION





       BARSAR, DISTT. HAMIRPUR, H.P.

                                                    ........RESPONDENTS

    (BY MR. ANIL KUMAR GOD, ADVOCATE)
    ___________________________________________________________

                Whether approved for reporting: No

                This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court

    passed the following:-




                                            ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:06:05 :::CIS
                                           2



                               ORDER

By way of this contempt petition, prayer is for taking .

action against the respondents for alleged willful disobedience of order dated 07.12.2017, passed by erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.(M) No. 550 of 2016, titled as Joginder Singh vs. HPSEB Ltd. and another.

2. Annexure P-1 appended with the petition, which purportedly is the order passed in the case of the petitioner by the learned Tribunal, demonstrates that the same pertains to one Santokha Ram and not the present petitioner.

3. Faced with this situation, Ms. Babita Kumari, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this petition but with liberty to file fresh petition on the same cause of action. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge September 21, 2021 (narender ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:06:05 :::CIS