Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Mansukh Belharbhai Palsana vs State Of Gujarat-Through Rai ... on 11 December, 2008

Author: Jayant Patel

Bench: Jayant Patel

SCA/14493/2008                    1/2                           ORDER


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

           SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 14493 of 2008


=========================================================
        MANSUKH BELHARBHAI PALSANA - Petitioner(s)
                           Versus
    STATE OF GUJARAT-THROUGH RAI CHOWDHARY-IAS OR HIS
               SUCCESSOR & 3 - Respondent(s)
=========================================================

Appearance :
MR BM MANGUKIYA for Petitioner(s) : 1,MS BELA A PRAJAPATI for
Petitioner(s) : 1,
MR VINAY PANDYA, AGP for Respondent(s) : 1,
None for Respondent(s) : 2 - 4.
=========================================================
           CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL



                          Date : 11/12/2008


                              ORAL ORDER

Mr.Mangukiya places on record the affidavit of Ms.Bela Prajapati, learned counsel who appeared before the Director with the record stating that the Director had declined to see the record. He seeks leave to place on record all receipts of the Market Committee for paying cess to show that the petitioner has done business as the license holder and cess is also paid which are not stated in the Certificate issued by the Market Committee and on the basis of which, the action has been initiated for declaring that the seat has fallen vacant.

Leave granted.

 SCA/14493/2008                      2/2                          ORDER



        Mr.Pandya,     learned       AGP   seeks    time    to   get
instruction.

Notice returnable on 22.12.2008. By ad interim order, it is directed that status quo filling up of the post, if any, shall be maintained. It is further directed that the petitioner shall be permitted to attend the meeting of the Market Committee, which is scheduled tomorrow, i.e. 12.12.2008, but his vote shall be separately counted and any action at the meeting shall be subject to further orders of this Court. D.S. permitted.

(JAYANT PATEL, J.) *bjoy