Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Costar Group vs Neptune Business Solutions Private ... on 1 August, 2023

Author: P.T. Asha

Bench: P.T. Asha

                                                                            C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                             Dated :     01.08.2023

                                                    CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA

                                       C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022
                                                     &
                                         A.Nos. 5724 to 5726 of 2022
                                                     &
                                             O.A.No. 399 of 2022


                     1.CoStar Group, Inc.
                     A corporation registered under the laws
                     of the State of Delaware and having its principal
                     place of business at 1331 L Street, NW,
                     Washington, District of Columbia
                     20005, United States of America,
                     represented by its attorney Mr. Bharath Madakari,
                     Indian Inhabitant

                     2.CoStar Realty Information, Inc.
                     A corporation registered under the laws
                     of the State of Delaware and having its principal place of business at
                     1331 L Street, NW,
                     Washington, District of Columbia
                     20005, United States of America
                     represented by its attorney Mr. Bharath Madakari,
                     Indian Inhabitant                                      ... plaintiffs
                     1/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                          C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022




                                                     Vs.


                     1.Neptune Business Solutions Private Limited
                     An unlisted private company limited by shares
                     having its registered Office
                     at Door No. SP-7A,
                     Guindy Industrial Estate
                     Sidco Guindy Industrial Estate,
                     Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 032, India

                     2.Ganesh Padasala Subramaniyan

                     3.Divya Bharathy

                     4.Vani Rajendran

                     5.Vipin Kumar

                     6.S.Logalakshmi                                      ... defendants

                     Prayer: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC and Order IV

                     Rule 1 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules 1994, and

                     Section 2 (1) (c ) (XVII) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial

                     Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act,

                     2015 r/w Section 62 of the Copyright Act, 1957, to



                     2/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022



                                  a. Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the

                     Defendants, their directors, employees, agents, promoters, proprietors,

                     managers,           assigns,   successors-in-interest,   sister         concerns,

                     representatives, servants, family members, employees, etc. and/or any

                     person or entity acting for, or, on behalf of them, from (i) accessing

                     Plaintiffs’ databases and websites without permission, (ii) copying

                     and/or using any of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted photographs in any

                     manner whatsoever, whether directly or indirectly, and (iii) accessing,

                     downloading, reproducing, publishing, storing, uploading and/or

                     using the Plaintiffs’ photographs, or any substantial parts thereof, or

                     any content, as available on Plaintiffs’ databases or websites, in any

                     manner whatsoever;



                                  b. Pass a decree against the Defendants, their directors,

                     employees, agents, promoters, proprietors, managers, assigns,

                     successors-in-interest, sister concerns, representatives, agents, family

                     members, employees, etc. and/or any person or entity acting for, or,

                     3/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                 C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022



                     on behalf of them, to surrender to the Plaintiffs, for the purpose of

                     destruction/erasure, all infringing materials including but not limited

                     to the copyrighted material;



                                  c. Pass a preliminary decree for rendition of account directing

                     the Defendants to produce before this Hon’ble Court or any person

                     nominated/ designated/ appointed by this Hon’ble Court all accounts

                     in general and invoices and sales figures/revenues in particular, and a

                     final decree be passed in favour of the Plaintiffs for the amounts of

                     profits, thus found to have been made by the Defendants after the

                     latter have rendered accounts;



                                  d. Pass a decree in favour of Plaintiffs for payment of damages

                     by the Defendants in the sum of at least INR 1,00,00,000 (Rupees One

                     Crore only), as and by way of damages for infringement of Plaintiffs’

                     copyright;




                     4/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                   C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022



                                  e. for costs of the suit; and



                                  f. for such further and other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deem

                     fit and proper in the interest of justice.


                                        For Plaintiff       :     Mr. P.S.Raman
                                                                  Senior Counsel
                                                                  for Mr. Edward James.

                                        For Defendants      :     Mr. S.Diwakar
                                        1&2

                                        For Defendants      :     Mr. R.Sathish Kumar
                                        3 to 6.

                                                                ORDER

The parties have entered into an agreement and have reduced their terms of agreement into a memo of consent terms and permanent injunction. Clause 5 (a) to (e) shall form part of the decree. As regards Clause 5 (b), it has been clarified by both the learned counsels that possession of the Mirror copies would be taken by the plaintiff from the expert, Alvarez & Marsal India Private Limited, to whom the 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022 mirror copies were handed over by order of this Court on 30.04.2023.

2. The learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiffs on instructions would submit that the plaintiffs shall erase and delete all the personal and unrelated data of the defendants.

3. The memo has also been filed by the defendants 3 to 6, in which they have stated that are willing to submit to prayer (a), which is extracted herein below:

“Pass a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their directors, employees, agents, promoters, proprietors, managers, assigns, successors-in-interest, sister concerns, representatives, servants, family members, employees, etc. and/or any person or entity acting for, or, on behalf of them, from (i) accessing Plaintiffs’ databases and websites without permission, (ii) copying and/or using any of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted photographs in any manner whatsoever, whether directly or indirectly, and (iii) accessing, downloading, reproducing, publishing, storing, 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022 uploading and/or using the Plaintiffs’ photographs, or any substantial parts thereof, or any content, as available on Plaintiffs’ databases or websites, in any manner whatsoever;”

4. It is also informed to the Court that the Advocate Commissioner's fees has been paid and that the Technical Expert's fees would be settled by the plaintiff.

5. The suit is decreed in terms of the consent memo and Clause 5 (a) to (e) shall form part of the decree. The said memo is taken on file. Consequently, the connected applications are closed. No costs. The Court fee shall be refunded as per procedure.


                                                                                         01.08.2023
                     Internet   :    Yes/No
                     Index      :    Yes/No
                     Speaking / Non-Speaking
                     kan



                                                                                 P.T. ASHA. J,

                     7/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                  C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022



                                                                          kan




                                  C.S (Comm Div). No. 134 of 2022




                                                           01.08.2023




                     8/8



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis