Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Tara Chand vs . The District Manager, Hafed, Sirsa on 24 September, 2010

Author: Ranjit Singh

Bench: Ranjit Singh

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                   CHANDIGARH


                        Civil Writ Petition No.17348 of 2010


Tara Chand              Vs.   The District Manager, Hafed, Sirsa
                              and another


Present:   Mr.Sandeep Kotla, Advocate,
           for Mr.Paramjit Jakhar, Advocate,
           for the petitioner.
                        *****

RANJIT SINGH, J.

The finding by the Labour Court is that there was nothing wrong with the termination order passed in respect of the petitioner- workman. His removal was held to fall under Sections 2(oo) (bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Accordingly, the Labour Court held that the petitioner could not be extended any benefit either of reinstatement or compensation. Reference has been made by the Labour Court to large number of judgments to show that no case for reinstatement of the petitioner would be made out as his appointment was dehors the rules if it could not be established that he has completed 240 days service to plead violation of any provision of the Industrial Disputes Act. I am not inclined to interfere in the impugned award.

Dismissed.

September 24, 2010                            ( RANJIT SINGH )
ramesh                                             JUDGE