Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M.Mohamed Ismail vs The Appellate Authority Cum on 12 August, 2021

Author: M.Duraiswamy

Bench: M.Duraiswamy

                                                                        W.P(MD)No.14098 of 2021


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                            DATED: 12.08.2021
                                                   CORAM:
                               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
                                                 AND
                              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

                                        W.P(MD)No.14098 of 2021
                                                 and
                                       W.M.P(MD)No.11061 of 2021


                     M.Mohamed Ismail                         ... Petitioner

                                                     Vs.


                     1.The Appellate Authority cum
                           Standing Committee of the Nagercoil
                                 Corporation Council,
                       Corporation Building,
                       Charles Miller Street,
                       Vetturnimadam,
                       Nagercoil.

                     2.The Commissioner,
                       Nagercoil Corporation,
                       Charles Miller Street,
                       Vetturnimadam,
                       Nagercoil.                             ... Respondents


                     PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
                     India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to
                     pass orders on the petitioner's appeal, dated 30.07.2021, made
                     under Section 452 of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act,
                     1981 read with Section 8 of Nagercoil City Municipal Corporation Act
                     2019 and consequently forbear the respondents from taking any
                     coercive action qua the petitioner's building in Town Survey No.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                     1/5
                                                                               W.P(MD)No.14098 of 2021


                     454/2A and 453/3B, Parakkai Village, Kanyakumari District, pending
                     such final determination of the appeal in the light of the decision of
                     the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Commissioner Corporation of
                     Madurai Vs. Dr.I.Ismail, 2017(5) CTC 558.


                                       For Petitioner           : Mr.Ajmalkhan
                                                                Senior Counsel
                                                                for M/s Ajmal Associates

                                       For Respondents          : Mr.P.Athimoolapandian


                                                           ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.DURAISWAMY,J.) The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to pass orders on the petitioner's appeal, dated 30.07.2021, made under Section 452 of the Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Act, 1981 read with Section 8 of Nagercoil City Municipal Corporation Act 2019 and consequently forbearing the respondents from taking any coercive action against the petitioner's building in Town Survey No.454/2A and 453/3B, Parakkai Village, Kanyakumari District, pending such final determination of the appeal.

2. Mr.Ajmalkhan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has filed an appeal dated 30.07.2021, the first respondent has not passed any order so https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 2/5 W.P(MD)No.14098 of 2021 far. Further, the learned Senior Counsel submitted that even during the pendency of the appeal before the first respondent, the second respondent is taking steps to take coercive action against the petitioner. In these circumstances, the learned Senior Counsel submitted that the first respondent may be directed to dispose of the appeal within a time frame and till such time, the second respondent may be directed to maintain status quo.

3. Mr.P.Athimoolapandian, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents submitted that the first respondent may be directed to dispose of the petitioner's appeal within a period of four weeks and till such time, the respondents shall maintain status quo.

4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Athimoolapandian, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, we direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's appeal dated 30.07.2021 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, we direct the second https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 3/5 W.P(MD)No.14098 of 2021 respondent to maintain status quo till the disposal of the appeal by the first respondent.

5. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

                                                            [M.D.,J]      [K.M.S.,J.]
                                                                   12.08.2021

                     Index        :Yes/No
                     Internet     :Yes/No
                     SSL
                     Note :
                     In view of the present lock down
                     owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a
                     web copy of the order may be

utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To

1.The Appellate Authority cum Standing Committee of the Nagercoil Corporation Council, Corporation Building, Charles Miller Street, Vetturnimadam, Nagercoil.

2.The Commissioner, Nagercoil Corporation, Charles Miller Street, Vetturnimadam, Nagercoil.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 4/5 W.P(MD)No.14098 of 2021 M.DURAISWAMY,J.

and K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

SSL W.P(MD)No.14098 of 2021 12.08.2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ 5/5