Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Adisri Business Services Pvt Ltd vs Footprints Childcare Pvt Ltd & Anr on 5 February, 2024

Author: Prateek Jalan

Bench: Prateek Jalan

                                          $~3
                                          *           IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                                          +           ARB.P. 897/2023 & I.A. 16694/2023

                                                      ADISRI BUSINESS SERVICES PVT LTD           ..... Petitioner
                                                                    Through: Mr. Ramit Malhotra, Advocate.

                                                                                         versus

                                                      FOOTPRINTS CHILDCARE PVT LTD & ANR. ..... Respondents
                                                                   Through: Mr. Anshul Rai & Mr. Ravi
                                                                            Lochan Daliparth, Advocates.

                                          CORAM:
                                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

                                                                                         ORDER

% 05.02.2024

1. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ["the Act"], seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties under a document dated 18.07.2022, entitled "Indicative Term Sheet". The document is signed by the representatives of both parties and contains a dispute resolution clause which provides for arbitration. New Delhi has been designated as the place of arbitration.

2. Disputes having arisen between the parties, arbitration was invoked by a communication dated 08.05.2023. The respondents also replied to the invocation notice, but parties could not reach consensus on the appointment of an arbitrator.

3. Earlier, a dispute was raised with regard to the stamping of the ARB.P. 897/2023 Page 1 of 2 This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2024 at 22:23:05 document and I am informed that the agreement has now been adequately stamped.

4. Mr. Anshul Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that there is no objection to the appointment of an arbitrator.

5. In view of the submissions of learned counsels for the parties, the disputes under the Indicative Term Sheet dated 18.07.2022 are referred to arbitration under the aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Shershah Road, New Delhi-110503 ["DIAC"]. DIAC is requested to appoint an arbitrator from its panel.

6. The arbitration proceedings will be governed by the Rules of DIAC, including as to remuneration of the learned Arbitrator. The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration under Section 12 of the Act, prior to entering upon the reference.

7. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the rights and contentions of the parties on merits, which are reserved for adjudication by the learned Arbitrator.

8. The petition, alongwith pending applications, stands disposed of.

9. The original Indicative Term Sheet filed with the Court may be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 5, 2024 'pv' / ARB.P. 897/2023 Page 2 of 2 This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2024 at 22:23:05