Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 14]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Naveen Kumar Son Of Shri Kailash Chand, ... vs State Of Rajasthan Through P.P on 20 July, 2018

       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

       S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3946/2018

 1.     Naveen Kumar Son Of Shri Kailash Chand,
 2.     Praveen Son Of Kailash Chand,
        Both by Caste Nai , Resident Of Village Nabi Nagar, Police
        Station And Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
                                                      ----Petitioners
                                 Versus
 1. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p. , Raj.
 2. Shyoram son of Chandar, by caste Nai, r/o Village Nabi Nagar,
 Police Station & Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan.
                                                     ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :   Mr. SS Sunda
For Respondent(s)        :   Mr. Prakash Thakuriya PP



   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA

                             -/Order/-

20/07/2018

            Shyoram, the complainant has alleged that his dwelling

place was put to fire. The police prepared the site plan also

showing that household articles were found burnt.

            As to who set the dwelling place on fire is disputed

question of fact and hence, the same cannot be determined by

this Court in a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Therefore, the

order of cognizance is upheld.

            At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioners

has submitted that petitioners are less than 18 years of age and therefore, they are delinquent juvenile in conflict with law.

The petitioners have been summoned through bailable warrants.

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-3946/2018] Prayer that the petitioners are delinquent juvenile in conflict with law and they be tried by concerned Juvenile Justice Board has not been made before the trial court.

Let petitioners at first instance file an application to this effect before the trial court. Upon filing of the said application, the trial court shall assign inquiry to the concerned Juvenile Justice Board to determine the age of the petitioners in terms of rule 12.3 of Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection) Rules, 2007. The Juvenile Justice Board shall hold an inquiry for determination of the age of the petitioners. In case, the Juvenile Justice Board comes to conclusion that the petitioners are less than 18 years of age, they will be tried by the concerned Juvenile Justice Board. If it is held otherwise, the petitioners shall be tried by the court of appropriate jurisdiction.

To facilitate inquiry, it is ordered that upon filing of the application regarding determination of age, the petitioners shall be released on interim bail till conclusion of the inquiry by the Juvenile Justice Board. In case, the Juvenile Justice Board comes to conclusion that the petitioners are juvenile in conflict with law, prayer for bail shall be dealt by the concerned Juvenile Justice Board. Otherwise, law shall take its own course and petitioners shall have to apply for bail as per provisions of Chapter XXXIII of Cr.P.C.

(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J Mak/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)