Bombay Presidency - Act
Bombay Local Fund Audit Act, 1930
BOMBAY PRESIDENCY
India
India
Bombay Local Fund Audit Act, 1930
Act 25 of 1930
- Published on 17 September 1930
- Not commenced
- [This is the version of this document from 17 September 1930.]
- [Note: The original publication document is not available and this content could not be verified.]
For Statement of Objects Reasons, see Bombay Government Gazette, 1930, Part V, pp. 44-49; for Report of Select Committee, see Bombay Government Gazette, 1930, Part v, pp. 116-121; and for Proceedings in Council see Bombay Legislative Council Debates, 1930, vols. XXVIII and XXIX.This Act was extended to the rest of the State of Maharashtra but excluding Greater Bombay (vide Maharashtra 3 of 1961, section 2).An Act to provide for and regulate the audit of the local funds under the management or control of certain local authorities in the [State of Maharashtra [* * *]].Whereas it is expedient to provide for and regulate the audit of the local funds under the management or control of certain local authorities in the [State of Maharashtra [* * *]] in manner hereinafter appearing;[******]It is hereby enacted as follows:-(a)"Auditor" means the [Director] or any other person empowered by [the [State] Government] to perform the functions of an auditor under this Act: [(aa)] "Chairman" means [in the case of [a Municipal Corporation, the Municipal Commissioner of the concerned Corporation, and in case of the Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships constituted under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965, the Chief Officer of the respective Municipal Council or Nagar Panchayats, as the case may be, and in respect of the Industrial Townships, the Chief Executive Officer of the respective Industrial Township], [in the case of a Zilla Parishad or Panchayat Samiti constituted under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961, the Chief Executive Officer as defined in that Act,] and in the case of any other local authority, the President or Chairman thereof;] and includes in the case of a dissolved or superseded local authority, the person or persons lawfully appointed to exercise the powers and perform the duties of such local authority;[(aaa) "Director" means the Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit and includes the Joint Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit, the Deputy Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit and the Assistant Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit;](ab)"Detailed audit" means an audit of accounts for the whole year;] (b)[*****] (c)"Local authority" means a local authority as defined in clause (26) of section 3 of the Bombay General Clause Act, 1904, and includes a school board constituted under the [Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947] [and a Panchayat Samiti constituted under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961]; (d)"Local Fund" means any fund to the control or management of which a local authority is legally entitled and includes the proceeds of any cess, rate duty or tax which such authority is legally entitled to impose, and any property, vested in such authority; [(e) "Special audit" means an audit of accounts pertaining to a specified item or series of items requiring thorough examination.][(2) On the commencement of the Bombay Local Fund Audit (Extension and Amendment) Act, 1960, any reference to the Examiner of Local Fund Accounts or the Assistant Examiner of Local Fund Accounts in any rule, requisition or order made under this Act, or in any other law for the time being in force, or in any instrument or document, shall be construed as a reference to the [Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit, the Joint Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit or, as the case may be, the Assistant Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit].](1)For the purpose of any audit under this Act, an auditor may[(a) require in writing the production at the head office of the local authority of such vouchers, statements, returns, correspondence, notes or other documents in relation to the accounts as he may think fit;](b)require in writing any salaried servant of the local authority accountable for, or having the custody or control of [such vouchers, statements, returns, correspondence, notes or other documents] or any person having directly or, indirectly by himself or his partner, any share interest in any contract with or under the local authority to appear in person before him at the head office of the local authority, and answer any question; (c)in the event of an explanation being required from the [* * *] chairman or other honorary officer or member of a local authority, in writing invite such person to meet him at the head office of the local authority and shall in writing specify the point on which his explanation is required. (2)The auditor may, in any requisition or invitation made under sub-section (1), fix a reasonable period [* * *] within which the said requisition or invitation shall be complied with. (3)The auditor shall give to the local authority not less than two weeks' notice in writing of the date on which he proposed to commence the audit:[Provided that, notwithstanding anything contained in this sub-section, the auditor may, for special reasons which shall be recorded in writing, give shorter notice than two weeks or commence special or detailed audit on the authority of [the State Government, Commissioner or [Director]] without giving notice.] (2)No court inferior to that of a Magistrate of the first class shall try any offence against this Act. (a)every payment which appears to him to be contrary to law, (b)the amount of any deficiency or loss which appears to have been caused by the gross negligence or misconduct of any person, [, irregularity in awarding contracts, decisions causing revenue loss and financial losses caused by policy decisions] (c)the amount of any sum received which ought to have been but is not brought into account by any person, and [Part-I Other Irregularities-](d)any material impropriety or irregularity which he may observe in the accounts other than those mentioned in clauses (a), (b) and (c) above. (2)On receipt of such intimation or explanation the [Director] may, in respect of all or any of the matters discussed in his report,(a)accept the intimation or explanation given by the [* * *] Chairman and withdraw the objection, or (b)direct that the matter be re-investigated at the next audit or at any earlier date, or (c)hold that the defects or irregularities pointed out in the report or any of them have not been removed or remedied. (3)The [Director] shall send a report of his decision to the Commissioner within one month of the date of the receipt by him of the intimation or explanation of the [* * *] chairman referred to in sub-section (1) or in the event of the [* * *] chairman failing to give such intimation or explanation, on the expiry of the period of [four months] mentioned in the said sub-section and [shall forward to the chairman a copy of such report specifying therein in particular the portions thereof to be published under sub-section (4)]. If the [Director] holds that any defects or irregularities have not been removed or remedied he shall state in the report whether, in his opinion, the defects or irregularities can be regularised and if so, by what method; and if they do not admit of being regularised, whether they can be condoned and, if so, by what authority. He shall also state whether the amounts to which the defects or irregularities relate should, in his opinion, be surcharged or charged:Provided that in the case of report on the accounts of school boards and of such local authorities as are specially notified by [the [State] Government] in this behalf the report referred to in this sub-section shall be [sent by the [Director] to the head of a department or such other officer as the State Government may direct, specifying in this report in particular the portions thereof to be published under sub-section 4. Such officer shall take such action as may be necessary regarding any defects or irregularities falling under clause (c) of sub-section (2) which may have been brought to notice in the report. If he is of the opinion that the amounts to which any such defects or irregularities relate should be surcharged or charged he shall forward the report to the Commissioner together with his recommendation in that behalf:][Provided further that, where the amount involved in any defect or irregularity to which objection has not been withdrawn under clause (a) of sub-section (2)], -[(i) does not exceed five hundred rupees, the Joint Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit or the Assistant Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit;(ii)does not exceed one thousand rupees, the Director, Local Fund Accounts Audit; may, if he considers that it ought to be condoned, condone such defect or irregularity. On such condonation, however, the officer concerned shall make a note to that effect in his report.] (4)The local authority concerned shall publish in its next administration report, such portions of the report under sub-section 8 as deal with defects and irregularities falling under clause (c) of sub-section (2), together with the explanation thereof, if any, given under sub-section (1) and the final report of the [Director] thereon under sub-section (3). Such report of defects and irregularities, explanation and final report shall be open to the inspection of the public at the office of the local authority for a period of one month from the date of their receipt and shall also be [published in Marathi in such newspapers circulating within the jurisdiction of the local authority as may be selected by the local authority], within one month of the receipt by it of the copy of the report sent to the Commissioner under sub-section (3):[Provided that] -(i)[a local authority (not being a Zilla Parishad, Panchayat Samiti or a Municipal Council for 'C' Class Municipal area within the meaning of the Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965)] whose annual income is less than Rs. 1,00,000 but exceeds Rs. 50,000 may, instead of so publishing the whole of such report of defects and irregularities, explanation and final report in such newspaper, publish in such newspaper a summary thereof [in Marathi], and (ii)a local authority whose annual income is Rs. 50,000 or less [a Zilla Parishad, Panchayat Samiti, or a Municipal Council for such 'C' Class Municipal area] may, instead of so publishing such report of defects and irregularities, explanation and final report in the newspaper, publish the same by affixing a copy thereof at its office and at such other conspicuous places within its limits as it may think fit, [and by inserting a notice [in Marathi] in such newspaper that the copy has been affixed for inspection of the public accordingly.] [(5) If the chairman fails to give the intimation or explanation referred to in sub-section (1) within the period therein mentioned the [Director] shall bring the fact to the notice of the Commissioner. Thereupon the Commissioner may [publish in Marathi in any newspaper circulating within the jurisdiction of the local authority] such portion of the [Director's] report under section 8 as may be specified by the [Director] or as the Commissioner may select together with any observations which the Commissioner may make on such report. The cost of such publication shall be forthwith paid by the local authority concerned. If the cost is not so paid, the Commissioner may make an order directing any person who for the time being has custody of any moneys on behalf of the local authority, as its officer treasurer banker or otherwise, to pay the amount of such cost from such moneys as he may in his hands or may from time to time, receive, and such person shall be bound to obey such order. Every payment made pursuant to such order shall be a sufficient discharge to such person from all liability to the local authority in respect of any amount paid by him out of the moneys of the local authority so held by him:Provided that, the Commissioner may(i)in the case of [a local authority referred to in clause (i) of the proviso to sub-section (4)], publish a summary of such report of defects and irregularities explanations and the final report [in Marathi] in any such newspaper, and (ii)in the case of [a local authority referred to in clause (ii) of the proviso to sub-section (4)], cause a copy of such report of defects and irregularities, explanations and final report to be kept at such conspicuous place within the limits of the local authority as he may think fit, and a notice to be published in such newspaper that such copy has been kept for inspection of the public accordingly. (5A)If a local authority fails to comply with any of the provisions of sub-section (4) the Commissioner may cause the relevant reports and explanations or summaries thereof to be published in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (5) so far as they may be applicable, as if there had been a failure to give the intimation or explanation required by sub-section (1), and the provisions of sub-section (5) shall apply also for recovery of costs of such publication made by the Commissioner.] (6)Nothing in this section or in section 9 shall preclude the [Director]at any time from bringing to the notice of the Commissioner for such action as the Commissioner may consider necessary, any information which appears to the [Director] to support a presumption of criminal misappropriation or fraud [or which in his opinion deserves special attention or immediate investigation.] (2)The Commissioner shall state in writing the reasons for his decision in respect of every surcharge or charge and shall send by registered post a copy thereof to the person against whom it is made. (3)If a person to whom a copy of the Commissioner's decision is sent under sub-section (2) refuses to take delivery thereof he shall be deemed to have duly received it on the day on which it was refused by him.[(4) If the Commissioner after considering the recommendation of the Chief Auditor under sub-section (3) of section 10, or of the head of the department or other officer under the first proviso to sub-section (3) of section 10, as the case may be and after obtaining the explanation of the person concerned or making such further enquiry as he may consider necessary, decides not to proceed further in the matter, he may waive the objection after recording his reasons therefor; and shall communicate the same to the [Director] or the head of the department or other officer as the case may be. [The Commissioner shall complete the above procedure within six months from the date of receipt of the proposal].] (2)The said sum if not duly paid, or if an application has been made to the Court or to [the [State] Government] against the decision of the Commissioner as provided in sub-section (1) of section 13 such sum as the Court or [the [State] Government] shall declare to be recoverable [as an arrear of land revenue]. (a)apply to the District Court to set aside such order; and the Court, after taking such evidence as it thinks necessary, may confirm, modify or remit such surcharge or charge and make such orders as to costs as it thinks proper in the circumstances; or (b)in lieu of such application apply to [the [State] Government] which shall pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit. [(2) The authority hearing the application may, if it thinks fit, stay all proceedings on the certificate pending disposal of the application.] - 14. Expenses in respect of requisitions of auditors to be payable out of local fund. - All expenses incurred by a local authority in complying with any requisition of an auditor under sub-section (1) of section 6 shall be payable out of its local fund(2)In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:-(a)the manner and form in which the accounts of a local authority, whose accounts are subject to audit under this Act, shall be kept and presented; (b)the powers and duties of auditors and the procedure to be followed by them for conducting an audit and the times at which such audit may be conducted; (c)the manner in which all matters required to be published under this Act shall be published. (3)The making of rules under this section shall be subject to the condition of previous publication. [All rules made under this section shall be laid for not less than thirty days before each House of the State Legislature as soon as possible after they are made, and shall be subject to such modifications as the State Legislature may make during the session in which they are so laid, or the session immediately following.] (a)the previous operation of the Act so repealed; or (b)the right or liability acquired or incurred under the Act so repealed; or (c)any penalty, forfeiture or punishment incurred in respect of any offence committed against any of the provisions of the Act so repealed; or (d)any investigation, legal proceeding or remedy in respect of any such right, liability, penalty, forfeiture or punishment as aforesaid; and any such investigation, legal proceeding or remedy may be instituted, continued or enforced, and any such penalty, forfeiture or punishment may be imposed as if this Act had not commenced:Provided further that, subject to the preceding proviso, anything done or any action taken (including any appointment or delegation or report made, notification, order, instruction or direction issued, rule framed, certificate obtained or permission granted) under the repealed Act shall, in so far as it is not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act, and shall continue to be in force accordingly, unless and until superseded by anything done or action taken under this Act.(1)Taluka Local Boards, (2)District Local Boards, (3)Municipalities, and (4)School Boards constituted under the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1923.G.N., C. & R.D., No ZPA-1063/1017-D-II dated 5th June, 1963 (M. G. Part IV-B, pages 676) - In pursuance of the provisions of section 4 of the Bombay Local Fund Audit Act, 1930 (Bombay XXV of 1930), the Government of Maharashtra hereby declares that the accounts of the Zilla Parishads constituted under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 (Maharashtra V of 1962), shall with effect from the 1st day of May 1962 be subject to audit in all respect in the manner provided for under the Bombay Local Fund Audit Act, 1930.G.N., R. D. D., No. ZPA-1062/6210/D-I dated 3rd December, 1964 (M. G., Part IV-B, pages 1616) - In pursuance of the provisions of section 4 of the Bombay Local Fund Audit Act, 1930 (Bombay XXV of 1930), the Government of Maharashtra hereby declares that the accounts of the Panchayat Samitis constituted under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 (Maharashtra V of 1962) shall always be deemed to be subject to audit in all respects in the manner provided by or under the first mentioned Act aforesaid.G.N., L. & J. D., No. CFA-1085/73(6)-X, dated 15th June, 1989 (M. G., Part IV-B, pages 778) - In exercise of the powers conferred by section 4 of the Bombay Local Fund Audit Act, 1930 (Bombay XXV of 1930), read by sub-section (4) of section 12 of the Maharashtra Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 1981 (Maharashtra LXI of 1981), the Government of Maharashtra hereby declares that the accounts of the Maharashtra Advocates Welfare Fund Trustee Committee shall be subject to audit annually by the Chief Auditor, Local Fund Accounts, Maharashtra State, Konkan Bhavan, New Bombay 400 614, with effect from the financial year 1989-90.