Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 21]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Shri Ghanshyam Rathore on 1 May, 2019

            THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH

      Common Conditional Orders in the matters relating to
           Serial Nos. 1001 to 1016 as per cause list

Gwalior, Dated : 01.05.2019

      The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to

obviate passing of identical conditional order in these matters

involving similar office objection/default :

      In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection

within the prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was

placed before the Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar granted

sufficient time to the petitioner(s) applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the

defect/office objection, however, due to non-removal of office

objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter

was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court

granted further time, by passing common order on the earlier

occasion.

      In spite of repeated opportunity ( three times-one under Rules,

second by the Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s),

applicant(s)/appellant(s)    has    failed     to   cure    the    office

objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last

opportunity, in terms of this order, SIX WEEKS further time is

granted to the petitioner(s), applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective

matters to remove office objection/default and make the matter ready

for further hearing within that time, failing which the concerned

petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
                                                               2

                    without further reference to the Court.

                          Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is

                    about non-service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the

extended period, the concerned matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent (s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent (s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.


                           Cases as per cause list number             Returnable Date

                                     1001 to 1016                        17-06-2019




                                 (Sanjay Yadav)                      (Vivek Agarwal)
                                     Judge                               Judge

Shubhankar*
     SHUBHANKAR
     MISHRA
     2019.05.02
     10:56:10 +05'30'