Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

M/S. Parle Agro (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes, ... on 4 July, 2016

Bench: A.K. Sikri, N.V. Ramana

     ITEM NO.50                                  COURT NO.11                  SECTION III

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F        I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 14697-14698/2016

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05/02/2016
     in OTA No. 7/2015 and dated 23/03/2016 in RP No. 172/2016 in OTA
     No. 7/2015 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam)

     M/S. PARLE AGRO (P) LTD.                                                 Petitioner(s)
                                     VERSUS
     COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, TRIVANDRUM                             Respondent(s)

     (With appln. (s) for permission to place addl. documents on record,
     interim relief and office report)

     Date : 04/07/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA

     For Petitioner(s)                    Mr.   K. K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv.
                                          Mr.   Arvind Dattar, Sr. Adv.
                                          Ms.   L. Charanaya, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Anandh K., Adv.
                                          Mr.   Hemant Bajaj, Adv.
                                          Mr.   M. P. Devanath, Adv.
                                          Mr.   H. G. Dharmadhikari, Adv.
                                          Ms.   Lalita S. Phadkke, mAdv.

     For Respondent(s)


                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

It is fairly pointed out by Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, that the office report is not correct as SLP (C) No. 9467/2016 does not raises the issue which arises for consideration in the present petitions.

List the instant petitions for preliminary hearing on Signature Not Verified 11th July, 2016.

Digitally signed by
NIDHI AHUJA
Date: 2016.07.06
10:41:01 IST
Reason:



                          (Nidhi Ahuja)                          (Tapan Kr. Chakraborty)
                          Court Master                                Court Master