Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S Swastik Rolling Mills on 12 September, 2017

        

 
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
REGIONAL BENCH : ALLAHABAD
COURT No. II
CROSS Application No. :E/CROSS/209/2011
APPEAL No: E/2071/2011-EX[SM]

(Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 116-CE/MRT-II/2011 dated 23/05/2011 passed by Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Meerut)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-II 			   Appellant
Vs.
M/s Swastik Rolling Mills 			                        Respondent

Appearance:

Shri Pawan Kumar Singh Supdt (AR),                                       for Appellant
Shri Jitin Singhal, Advocate                                                    for Respondent

CORAM:
Honble Mr. Ashok Jindal, Member (Judicial)


Date of Hearing	:	12/09/2017
Date of Decision	:	12/09/2017


FINAL ORDER NO-70971/2017

Per: Ashok Jindal 

Revenue is in appeal against the order dated 23.05.2011 of Commissioner (Appeals), Meerut.

2.?I am informed about the Instructions dated 17-12-2015 issued by the C.B.E. & C. in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 fixing monetary limits below which appeal shall not be filed in the Tribunal. The monetary limit has been enhanced to Rs. 10 lakhs through the said Instructions. Further, the Board vide letter dated 1-1-2016 clarified that the said instructions will apply to all pending appeals in CESTAT.

3.?I also find that the Honble High Courts of Madras, Karnataka and Gujarat have held that the litigation policy containing monetary limit for filing appeals will apply to pending appeals also. [2015 (40) S.T.R. 656 (Mad.); 2014 (306) E.L.T. 153 (Guj.); 2011 (268) E.L.T. 344 (Kar.) = 2012 (26) S.T.R. 79 (Kar.)].

4.?I am informed by the ld. AR that the present appeal is not falling under any one of the excluded category mentioned in the above Instructions.

5.?Considering the above position, I dismiss the appeal filed by the Revenue. Cross objections also stands disposed of. (Dictated & Pronounced in Court) (Ashok Jindal) Member (Judicial) akp 1 2 CROSS Application No. :E/CROSS/209/2011 APPEAL No: E/2071/2011-EX[SM]