Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Michael vs Ajayan on 12 October, 2012

Author: K.M.Joseph

Bench: K.M.Joseph

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH
                                   &
               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN

         TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2013/5TH CHAITHRA 1935

                      WP(C).No. 8509 of 2013 (K)
                      ---------------------------

PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
-----------------------

       MICHAEL, AGED 78 YEARS
       S/O.PHILIPOSE, PUTHUPPALLYMATTOM HOUSE, PAMPADY
       KOTTAYAM.

       BY ADVS.SRI.RAJEEV V.KURUP
               SMT.DEVYA S.NATH

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
------------------------

          1. AJAYAN, AGED 35 YEARS
            S/O.ANANDAN, VELLAPPALLIYIL HOUSE, PAMPADY.P.O
            KOTTAYAM-686502.

          2. CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR,
            PUTHENPURACKAL HOUSE, PAMPADY.P.O, KOTTAYAM-686502.

          3. V.T.BABU, AGED 43 YEARS
            S/O.NEELAKANTAN, VENGASERIL, NEDUMKUNNAM
            KOTTAYAM, PIN-686542.

          4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
            KARUKACHAL POLICE STATION, KARUKACHAL
            KOTTAYAM-686540.

          5. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
            CIRCLE OFFICE, VAKATHANAM, KOTTAYAM-686538.

        BY  R4 & R5 BY ADDL. ADV. GENERAL SRI.P.C.IYPE
        BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.DHANESH MATHEW

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
26-03-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


VK

WP(C).No. 8509 of 2013 (K)
---------------------------
                             APPENDIX
                             ---------
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------

EXHIBIT-P1  TRUE COPY OF THE PERTITION DTED 335/1962.


EXHIBIT-P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 12/10/2012

EXHIBIT-P3 TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DT.14/12/12

EXHIBIT-P4  TRUE COPY OF THE RE-SURVEY PLAN.

EXHIBIT-P4(A) TRUE COPY OF THE LOCATION SKETCH

EXHIBIT-P5  TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 21/12/2004 IN O.S.245/2002
BEFORE THE MUNSIFF COURT,CHANGANACHERRY.

EXHIBIT-P6  TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8/7/2011 IN E.P.88/10 OF THE
MUNSIFF,COURT,CHANGANACHERRY.

EXHIBIT-P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13/8/2012 IN OP(C)2729/2011 OF
THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

EXHIBIT-P8  TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.B5-13394/12 ISSUED BY THE
TAHSILDAR.

EXHIBIT-P9  TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE TALUK SURVEYOR
CHANGANACHERRY.

EXHIBIT-P10  TRUE COPY OF THE SKETCH PREPARED BY THE ADDL.TAHSILDAR
CHANGANACHERRY.

EXHIBIT-P11  TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 8/3/2013 FILED BEFORE THE
4TH RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT-P12  TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD FOR RECEIPT OF EXT.P1
COMPLAINT ON 13/3/2013 BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P12(A) TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD FOR RECEIPT OF
EXT.P1  COMPLAINT ON 13/3/2013 BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P12(B) TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD FOR RECEIPT OF
EXT.P1 COMPLAINT ON 13/3/2013 BY DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF
POLICE,KOTTAYAM.

EXHIBIT-P13  TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT DATED 16/3/2013 IN O.S.88/2013 OF
THE MUNSIFF COURT,CHANGANACHERRY.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS  : NIL
-----------------------
                                               / TRUE COPY /

                                               P.A. TO JUDGE
VK



                 K.M.JOSEPH & K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ.
               ------------------------------------------------------------
                           W.P.(C) No.8509 of 2013
                        -----------------------------------------
                 Dated, this the 26th day of March, 2013

                                J U D G M E N T

K.M.Joseph, J.

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking protection for construction of a compound wall. Admittedly, petitioner has not obtained permission from the Panchayat. In such circumstances, the writ petition cannot be considered. Without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek appropriate relief after obtaining permission, this writ petition is closed.

(K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE.

( K.RAMAKRISHNAN) JUDGE.

MS