Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

M/S Swastik Filling Station vs Narpal Singh on 18 October, 2019

Author: Avneesh Jhingan

Bench: Avneesh Jhingan

210
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                           AT CHANDIGARH
                                 ****
                                   COCP No.2507 of 2018
                                   Date of Decision: 18.10.2019

M/s Swastik Filling Station
                                                                         Petitioner
                                         Versus

Narpal Singh, Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Panipat
Marketing Complex, Village Baholi, Panipat

                                                                     Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:        Mr. Ashutosh Jerath, Advocate for
                Ms. Palak Dev, Advocate
                for the petitioner.

                Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate for
                Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate
                for the respondent.

                                             ****
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the Letters Patent Appeal [LPA] has been preferred by respondent and as per interim order, contempt petition cannot be proceeded with as on date.

In view of above, contempt petition is disposed of at this stage with liberty to revive the same, if cause of action survives either after decision of the LPA or the interim order is modified.

[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE October 18, 2019 pankaj baweja

1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No

2. Whether reportable : Yes / No 1 of 1 ::: Downloaded on - 21-10-2019 05:22:07 :::