Kerala High Court
K.R.Purendran vs Smt.Roopakala S.Jagath on 7 June, 2011
Author: P.N.Ravindran
Bench: P.N.Ravindran
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.RAVINDRAN
MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JULY 2012/11TH ASHADHA 1934
Con.Case(C).No. 671 of 2012 (S)
-------------------------------
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WPC.12089/2011 DATED 07-06-2011
PETITIONERS:
----------------
1. K.R.PURENDRAN, AGED 69 YEARS
S/O.K.V.RAGHAVAN, KUDAZHATHU HOUSE, KALOOR POST
ELAMKULAM VILLAGE
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. (CG.437/05)(PPO.31006).
2. CHARLES DIAS, AGED 64 YEARS
S/O.JOSEPH DIAS, TINAR DALE HOUSE, MAJOR ROAD
VYTTILA POST, POONITHURA VILLAGE
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. (CG3/07)PPO34375.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.SANTHOSH JOSE
RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT:
-------------------------------------
SMT.ROOPAKALA S.JAGATH, AGED 52 YEARS
W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHUTHI BHAVAN
PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001
BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY
HEARD ON 02-07-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
Con.Case(C).No. 671 of 2012 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURES
ANNEXURE A1: THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 07.06.2011
PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WPC NO.
12089/2011
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE.
dlk
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------
Cont.Case(C) No. 671 of 2012
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2012
JUDGMENT
This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondent has wilfully disobeyed the directions issued by this Court in Annexure A1 judgement in WP(C) No.12089 of 2011. When the writ petition came up for hearing today, learned counsel on both sides submitted that the direction regarding payment of principal amount of the gratuity has been complied with. The learned standing counsel appearing for the Kerala State Electricity Board and the respondent, who is present in person, submitted that the period fixed by this Court for payment of interest has expired, but payment of interest will be made within two weeks from today. The said submission is recorded and the contempt case is closed.
Sd/-
P.N.RAVINDRAN, JUDGE.
Rkc // true copy// PA to Judge