Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 2]

Bombay High Court

Balasaheb Sampatrao Kadam, L.Rs. ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 16 February, 2016

Author: S.V.Gangapurwala

Bench: S.V.Gangapurwala, A.M.Badar

                                                                         wp4511-13
                                         -1-




                                                                         
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             BENCH AT AURANGABAD




                                                 
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 4511 OF 2013




                                                
     1]       Balasaheb s/o Sampatrao Kadam
              (Since deceased) through L.Rs.




                                        
              1-A)Shakuntalabai wd/o Balasaheb Kadam
              Age : major, Occ-household, and Agril
                             
     2]       Bhagwan s/o Sampatrao Kadam
                            
              age major, occ-Agril


     3]       Vasant s/o Sampatrao Kadam
      


              age major, Occ-Agril
   



     4]       Arun s/o Sampatrao Kadam
              age major, Occ-Agril





              All r/o Brahmawadkdi, Tq. Sailu
              Dist.Parbhani.                     .. PETITIONERS





                      Versus


     1]       The State of Maharashtra
              through Secretary
              Irrigation Department,
              Mantralaya, Mumbai


     2]       The Special Land Acquisition



    ::: Uploaded on - 20/02/2016                 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 05:29:58 :::
                                                                              wp4511-13
                                           -2-

              Officer, Marathwada Agriculture




                                                                             
              University, Parbhani, Tq.&Dist.Parbhani.




                                                     
     3]       The Sub-Divisional Officer
              Manjara Project Land Development
              Sub-Division No.3, Jayakwadi camp




                                                    
              Parbhani, Tq. & Dist.Parbhani.                  ..RESPONDENTS
              ...
     Mr.V.D.Salunke, Advocate for petitioners




                                      
     Ms.S.S.Raut, AGP for respondent State
                             
     Mr.B.R.Surwase,Adv. For respondent no.3
              ...
                            
                                   CORAM :       S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
                                                 A.M.BADAR,JJ.

                                   DATED :       16TH FEBRUARY,2016
      
   



     ORAL JUDGMENT [PER S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.] :-

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, Petition is taken up for final hearing.

2] Mr. Salunke, learned counsel submits that the award dated 12/10/2010 is assailed on the ground that after declaration u/s 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, award was not passed within two years. The learned counsel further submits that as yet the possession is with the petitioner. The respondents have not taken the possession and even in view of the provisions in the Act, more particularly Section 24(2), the award ::: Uploaded on - 20/02/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 05:29:58 ::: wp4511-13 -3- lapses.

3] The learned AGP submits that declaration u/s 6 of the Land Acquisition Act was published on 22/5/2008 in the Government Gazette and in two daily news papers the same was published on 10/6/2008 and 13/6/2008. However, in the record, the publication so far as village Chawadi is concerned, does not appear and thereafter the notice u/s 9 is issued and served upon the petitioner on 10/6/2008. According to the learned AGP the award is passed, the same is legal and valid.

4] Mr.Survase, learned counsel appears for the acquiring body and submits that the possession of the land is not yet delivered to the acquiring body.

5] Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 reads as under :

"11-A] The Collector shall make an award under Section 11 within a period of two years from the date of the publication of the declaration and if no award is made within that period, the entire proceeding for the acquisition of the land shall lapse.





                              Provided that in a case where the said
                     declaration        has     been     published        before       the
                     commencement               of     the     Lanc         Acquisition
(Amendment) Act, 1984, the award shall be made within a period of two years from such commencement."

6] Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and ::: Uploaded on - 20/02/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 05:29:58 ::: wp4511-13 -4- Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 reads as under :

"24(2)Notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1), in case of land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (1 of 1894), where an award under the said section 11 has been made five years or more prior to the commencement of this Act but the physical possession of the land has not been taken or the compensation has not been paid the said proceedings shall be deemed to have lapsed and the appropriate Government, if it so chooses, shall initiate the proceedings of such land acquisition afresh in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Provided that where an award has been made and compensation in respect of a majority of land holdings has not been deposited in the account of the beneficiaries, then, all beneficiaries specified in the notification for acquisition under section 4 of the said Land Acquisition Act, shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions of this Act."

7] The following dates are undisputed.

(1) Declaration under Section 6 is published in the Gazette on 22/5/2008; (2) Declaration under Section 6 is published in two local ::: Uploaded on - 20/02/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 05:29:58 ::: wp4511-13 -5- news papers on 10/6/2008 and 13/6/2008. There is no publication in village Chawadi as per the record and (3) The award is passed on 12/10/2010. If the aforesaid dates are considered, the award is passed after two years after declaration u/s 6 of the Land Acquisition Act. Nothing is brought on record that at the relevant time, any prohibitory orders were in force.

8] In view of Section 11-A of the Act, the acquisition proceedings shall lapse.

9] There is another facet to the present matter that though the award is passed on 12/10/2010, prior to five years, the possession has not yet been taken. Even in the affidavit respondent State accepts that the possession of the land acquired is still with the petitioner. In view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, possession is not taken for a period of 5 years after passing of the award, acquisition stands lapsed.

10] In light of the above, Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses "B" and "C". Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

(A.M.BADAR,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) umg/ ::: Uploaded on - 20/02/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 31/07/2016 05:29:58 :::