Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Antiush Nasiyant vs The State Administration Of U.T. Of ... on 22 August, 2023

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: Sarang V. Kotwal

                          :1:                1-revn-243-23-iast-14961-23-SPKNG.odt




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

        CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2023

 Antiush Nasiyant                                           .....Applicant
              Versus
 The State Administration of
 U.T. of Daman and Diu                                      .... Respondent
                                 .....
                                WITH
             INTERIM APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.14961 OF 2023
                                 IN
             CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2023

                                  -----
 Ms. Naina Sharma, Advocate for the Applicant.
 Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent-State.
                                  -----

                                    CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

                                    DATE     : 22nd AUGUST, 2023
 P.C. :

 1.               This matter is placed on board for speaking to the
 minutes of the order dated 11.8.2023. In the said order, it is necessary
 to mention 'Interim Application (Stamp) No.14961 of 2023' in the
 cause title.

 2.               The title of the order dated 11.8.2023 be corrected and
 corrected order be uploaded with this order. Rest of the order dated
 11.8.2023 shall remain as it is.


                                            (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)


 CORRECTED ORDER DATED 11.8.2023 READS THUS :


                                                                             1 of 6

  Deshmane(PS)




::: Uploaded on - 23/08/2023                      ::: Downloaded on - 24/08/2023 03:35:34 :::
                           :2:          1-revn-243-23-iast-14961-23-SPKNG.odt

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

      CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2023

 Antiush Nasiyant                                     .....Applicant
            Versus
 The State Administration of
 U.T. of Daman and Diu                                .... Respondent

                               .....
                             WITH
          INTERIM APPLICATION [STAMP] NO.14961 OF 2023
                               IN
          CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.243 OF 2023

                               -----
 Mr. Mahesh Vishwakarma, Advocate a/w. Naina Sharma i/b.
 Ranjeet Chauhan, for the Applicant.
 Mr. Aayush Kedia, Advocate i/b. H.S. Venegavkar for
 Respondent No.1-UT.
 Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the State.
                               -----


                                CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

                                DATE   : 11th AUGUST, 2023

 P.C. :

 1.               The Applicant was the accused in Summary

 Criminal Case No.17/2010 before the Judicial Magistrate,

 First Class, Diu. Learned trial Judge, vide his judgment and

 order date 29.3.2011, convicted and sentenced the Applicant
                                                                       2 of 6




::: Uploaded on - 23/08/2023                ::: Downloaded on - 24/08/2023 03:35:34 :::
                           :3:                   1-revn-243-23-iast-14961-23-SPKNG.odt

 for commission of the offence punishable under Section 280

 of IPC and sentenced him to suffer SI for one month and to

 pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default to suffer SI for one

 week. The Applicant was also convicted for commission of

 the offence punishable under Sections 427 of IPC and was

 sentenced to suffer SI for three months and to pay fine of

 Rs.1,000/- and in default to suffer SI for one week. The

 sentences were directed to run concurrently. The Applicant

 preferred Criminal Appeal No.1/2011 before the Court of

 Sessions at Diu. Said Appeal was dismissed by the order

 dated 27.12.2019.


 2.               Heard         Shri   Mahesh   Vishwakarma,             learned

 counsel for the Applicant and Shri Aayush Kedia, learned

 counsel for Respondent No.1.


 3.               The prosecution case is that on 1.5.2010 at about

 11.55 a.m. at Bunder Jetty, Diu, the Applicant navigated his

 boat 12 Ton No.DD-MP-12-01 in a rash and negligent

 manner. It dashed against two police boats causing damage

 to both of them.               The investigation was conducted and
                                                                                3 of 6




::: Uploaded on - 23/08/2023                         ::: Downloaded on - 24/08/2023 03:35:34 :::
                           :4:             1-revn-243-23-iast-14961-23-SPKNG.odt

 during trial six witnesses were examined. PW-1, PW-3, PW-4

 and PW-5 were the alleged eye witnesses. PW-1 was the first

 informant. PW-2 was the pancha witness and PW-6 was the

 investigating officer.


 4.               Learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that

 PW-4 has not specifically stated that the Applicant was

 navigating that particular boat. As far as PW-1 is concerned,

 admittedly he saw the damage after he heard the noise and,

 therefore, he was not in a position to see actually who was

 navigating the boat which dashed against the police boats.


 5.               Learned counsel further submitted that the

 complainant i.e. PW-1 has admitted that it was a rough

 weather day and the rope had fraction with the wall which

 could have caused breaking of the rope. Learned counsel

 submitted that, it was the reason why the incident had

 occurred. Both the Courts below have not given sufficient

 importance to these admissions. He further submitted that

 the prosecution has not led any evidence to show that the

 boats were actually damaged.
                                                                          4 of 6




::: Uploaded on - 23/08/2023                   ::: Downloaded on - 24/08/2023 03:35:34 :::
                           :5:             1-revn-243-23-iast-14961-23-SPKNG.odt




 6.               Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent

 No.2 submitted that PW-2 was a pancha witness who has

 deposed about the damage caused to two boats. He further

 submitted that PW-1 was already inside the police boat

 which was damaged. Therefore, the offence under Sections

 280 as well as 427 of IPC are made out.


 7.               I have considered these submissions.                Some

 argueable points are raised by learned counsel for the

 Applicant. The reasoning given by both the Courts below in

 the light of the submissions made before me today on the

 basis of the evidence led before the trial Court will have to

 be considered. Learned counsel for the Applicant has made

 out a case for admitting the Revision Application. Based on

 the same reasons, the sentence imposed on the Applicant can

 be suspended. The incident is old. There are no allegations

 that all throughout these years, the Applicant had misused

 his liberty.           Therefore, till decision of the Revision

 Application, the Applicant can be released on bail.
                                                                          5 of 6




::: Uploaded on - 23/08/2023                   ::: Downloaded on - 24/08/2023 03:35:34 :::
                           :6:                    1-revn-243-23-iast-14961-23-SPKNG.odt

 8.                Hence, the following order:

                                   :: O R D E R :

:

i. Criminal Revision Application is admitted. ii. During pendency and final disposal of the Revision Application, the sentence imposed on the Applicant is suspended. The Applicant is directed to execute a PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. iii. The Interim Application for suspension of sentence is disposed of.
iv. Criminal Revision Application shall be processed further. R & P be called for.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Deshmane (PS) 6 of 6 ::: Uploaded on - 23/08/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 24/08/2023 03:35:34 :::