Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Lingappa @ Ningaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 3 September, 2025

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                                              -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:34696
                                                        WP No. 30161 of 2024


                    HC-KAR




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
                         WRIT PETITION NO. 30161 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
                   BETWEEN:

                   SRI. LINGAPPA @ NINGAIAH
                   S/O BENGLURAIAH,
                   AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
                   RESIDING AT KODIYALA, KARENAHALLI,
                   RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT.
                                                                ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. GEETHA A., ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                         REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
                         REVENUE DEPARTMENT
                         M.S BUILDING,
                         BANGALORE - 560 001.
Digitally signed by
KRISHNAPPA          2.   THE TAHSILDAR
LAXMI YASHODA
                         RAMANAGARA TALUK,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                 RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159.
KARNATAKA                                                    ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA)


                        THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
                   AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
                   DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO ISSUE ENDORSEMENT
                   TO PAY THE CALCULATED 'PREMIUM' IN RESPECT OF THE LAND
                   IN QUESTION BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION DATED
                   ON 07.10.2024 GIVEN TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE
                   ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.
                             -2-
                                           NC: 2025:KHC:34696
                                     WP No. 30161 of 2024


HC-KAR




    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS


                      ORAL ORDER

Learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to take notice for both the respondents.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted 2 Acre and 16 Guntas of land in Sy.No.483 of Kodiyala Karenahalli Village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk and District. Prior to that the petitioner was called upon to pay the requisite premium/ kimath. However, it is contended that due to ignorance, the petitioner, did not pay the premium/kimath. However, the petitioner thereafter approached the Tahsildar seeking permission to pay the premium/kimath, but the Tahsildar refused to receive the same. The petitioner has given representation dated 07.10.2024 at Annexure-C, to the Tahsildar, Ramanagara Taluk. The petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent-Tahsildar, -3- NC: 2025:KHC:34696 WP No. 30161 of 2024 HC-KAR Ramanagara Taluk, to consider the representation at Annexure-C to receive the premium/kimath and for the issuance of a Saguvali Chit.

3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and having perused the petition papers, this Court finds that respondent No.2-Tahsildar, Ramanagara Taluk, is duty bound to consider the representation given by the petitioner for issuance of Grant Certificate/Saguvali Chit. Needless to observe that the Tahsildar may call upon the petitioner to furnish any required information, verify the same from the records, and if the Tahsildar finds that the petitioner was in fact granted 2 Acre and 16 Guntas of land in terms of the Official Memorandum, call upon the petitioner to pay the kimath. On the other hand, if the petitioner has already paid the kimath, then the Tahsildar has to proceed to issue the Grant Certificate/Saguvali Chit. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. -4-

NC: 2025:KHC:34696 WP No. 30161 of 2024 HC-KAR

4. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.

Sd/-

(R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4