Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Sharda Pareek vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax on 11 September, 2017

Bench: Rohinton Fali Nariman, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

     ITEM NO.29                                COURT NO.10                       SECTION XV
                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F            I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s)   for                     Special       Leave     to     Appeal     (C)       No(s).
     20629-20631/2017

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-04-2017
     in DBITA No. 156/2012 26-04-2017 in DBITA No. 162/2012 26-04-2017
     in DBITA No. 199/2015 passed by the High Court Of Judicature For
     Rajasthan At Jaipur)

     SHARDA PAREEK                                                                  Petitioner(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.                                    Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.73027/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     O.T. and IA No.73285/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS)

     Date : 11-09-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

     For Petitioner(s)                    Mr.   Arvind Datar, Sr. Adv.
                                          Mr.   Aruneshwar Gupta, Adv.
                                          Mr.   Varun Dewan, Adv.
                                          Mr.   B. Mohan, AOR
     For Respondent(s)

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

Exemption from filing O.T. is allowed. Issue notice.

In the meantime, there shall be stay of the directions contained in para 11.2 of the impugned judgment.

During the course of the hearing, we have been informed by learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner that Appeal No. 1373/2004 continues to be pending before the High Court at Jaipur. We Signature Not Verified request the Jaipur High Court to take up the said appeal and decide Digitally signed by R.NATARAJAN Date: 2017.09.11 16:40:08 IST Reason: the same at the earliest.

     (R. NATARAJAN)                                                            (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)
      COURT MASTER                                                                COURT MASTER