Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

C.Ramalingam,Trichy. vs S.Jambulingam & Another,Tanjore. on 2 June, 2015

     IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
                  COMMISSION, MADURAI BENCH.

Present:   Thiru.J.JAYARAM,                        Presiding Judicial Member

Thiru.M.MURUGESAN, Member.

F.A.No.173/2012 (F.A.No.646/2011 on the file of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chennai) (Against the order in C.C.No.65/2007, dated 31.05.2010 on the file of the DCDRF, Thanjavur.) TUESDAY THE 02nd DAY OF JUNE 2015.

1. C. Ramalingam, S/o. P.V. Chidambaram, (Age 62), District Regional Transport Officer,(Retired), Regional Transport Office, Thanjavur. Appellant/1st Opposite Party Residing at 71-A, Ganapathi Nagar, Thiruvanaikoil, Tiruchirappalli - 620 005.

Vs

1. S. Jambulingam, S/o. Saminatha Gandiar, Tharaswaram - 612 702, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District. 1st Respondent/Complainant

2. The Regional Transport Authority, Cum District Collector, Collectorate, Thanjavur. 2nd Respondent/2nd Opposite Party Counsel for Appellant/1st Opposite Party : Mr.S. Janahar, Advocate. Counsel for Respondent-1/Complainant : Steps not taken. Counsel for Respondent-2/Opposite Party-2 : Private steps. 2

DOCKET ORDER THIRU.J.JAYARAM, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER.

Appellant called absent. No representation for the appellant in spite of specific direction given for appearance of the appellant and no step was taken for appearance of Respondent-1. The appellant is continuously absent for several hearings on 20.03.2014, 10.04.2014, 03.06.2014, 23.06.2014, 15.07.2014, 08.08.2014, 19.08.2014, 10.09.2014, 08.10.2014, 29.10.2014, 10.11.2014, 28.11.2014, 12.12.2014, 07.01.2015, 02.02.2015, 23.02.2015, 12.03.2015, 01.04.2015, 21.04.2015 and even today itself. This shows that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. No purpose would be served if the appeal is kept pending before this Commission without any progress. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/-xxxxxx                                           Sd/-xxxxxx
M.MURUGESAN,                                          J.JAYARAM,
Member.                                          Presiding Judicial Member.
 3