Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

State Of H.P. & Anr vs Kamla Devi on 28 July, 2023

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Satyen Vaidya

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.

                                                  CMP(M) No. 918 of 2023 &




                                                                                 .
                                                  LPA No. 134 of 2023





                                                  Decided on: 28.07.2023
    State of H.P. & Anr.                                          ...Appellants





                                                  Versus

    Kamla Devi                                                              ...Respondent

    Coram:





    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting? 1             No.



    For the Appellants :
                             r           Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila

                                         Patial, Addl. A.Gs. With Mr. J. S. Guleria,
                                         Ms. Priyanka Chauhan and Mr. Rajat
                                         Chauhan, Law Officer.

    For the Respondent : Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate.



    Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
CMP(M) No. 918 of 2023

Notice. Ms. Anjali Soni Verma, Advocate, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent.

2. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the Director, Health Services, Himachal Pradesh, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 48 days' that has crept up in filing the appeal. Ordered accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

Appeal be registered.

1

Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes ::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2023 21:38:53 :::CIS 2 LPA No. 134 of 2023

3. Learned Additional Advocate General fairly concedes .

that the issue in question is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Bench in LPA No. 117 of 2023 in case titled State of Himachal Pradesh and another vs. Nisha Kumari and others, decided on 21.07.2023.

4. For the reasons stated in the aforesaid judgment which shall be read mutatis mutandis in the instant case, the appeal is dismissed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.



                                         (Tarlok Singh Chauhan)


                                                  Judge


                                             (Satyen Vaidya)




           28th July, 2023                       Judge
              (sanjeev)






                                            ::: Downloaded on - 28/07/2023 21:38:53 :::CIS