Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Paras Nath Yadav vs The State Of Jharkhand Through ... on 20 July, 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI                         A.B.A. No.682 of 2015 Paras Nath Yadav                            ...... Petitioner                      Versus  The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance          ...... Opposite Party                                          ­­­­­­­­­ CORAM:  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY ­­­­­­­­­ For the Petitioner           : Mr. Saket Kumar, Advocate For the Vigilance           : Mrs. Chandra Prabha, Advocate    ­­­­­­­­ Order No.07  th  Dated: 20    July, 2015     Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner   is   accused   in   connection   with   Special   Case   No.06   of   2014  corresponding to Vigilance P.S. Case No.05 of 2014, pending in the Court of  learned Special Judge, Vigilance, Ranchi.  

There is allegation that the petitioner being B.D.O., in connivance with  Praveen Kumar Singh and others, has given benefit of National Crop Insurance  Scheme   to   fake   persons   and   fake   certificates   regarding   their   eligibility   for  getting the benefit have also been given and signed by the petitioner too.  

It is submitted that petitioner was not the custodian of relevant records  rather it was the Circle Officer who was custodian of the records.  No benefit of  said scheme has been given to any of the relatives of the petitioner.  He did not   get pecuniary benefit out of said scam.   He has been falsely implicated in this  case.  At best, he can be held liable for dereliction of duty.

Learned counsel appearing for the Vigilance has opposed the prayer for  bail.

Considering   the   allegation,   I   do   not   feel   inclined   to   give   benefit   of  Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner.  Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail  made on behalf of above named petitioner stands rejected. 

                    

                           (D. N. Upadhyay, J.)                 NKC