Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Neelam Sharma vs Ekant Rekhan on 8 May, 2019

Bench: R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy

     ITEM NO.11                                    COURT NO.7                      SECTION XIV

                                       S U P R E M E C O U R T O F             I N D I A
                                               RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 10967/2019
     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-01-2019
     in RCREV No. 398/2018 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New
     Delhi)

     NEELAM SHARMA                                                                    Petitioner(s)

                                                            VERSUS

     EKANT REKHAN                                                                     Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. )

     Date : 08-05-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                               HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY


     For Petitioner(s)                        Ms. Bharti Tyagi, AOR
                                              Ms. Roopa Nagpal,Adv.
                                              Mr. Vijay Kinger,Adv.

     For Respondent(s)

                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

We have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

In Paragraph 15 of the impugned judgment, the High Court has observed that the possession of the shop in question, admittedly is taken over by the respondent on 30.08.2018 in execution proceedings. Therefore, the revision before the High Court has become infructuous. In such view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain this special leave petition.

The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Signature Not Verified

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

Digitally signed by
MADHU BALA
Date: 2019.05.09

     (MADHU BALA)
11:18:50 IST
Reason:                                                                 (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA)
     COURT MASTER (SH)                                                           BRANCH OFFICER