Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Dr.Anandhasekar vs The District Collector on 11 September, 2018

Bench: T.Raja, Krishnan Ramasamy

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.09.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.(MD)No.17745 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD).No.15632 of 2018 Dr.Anandhasekar ...

Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Thanjavur District.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur.

3. The Tahsildar, Thanjavur.

4. The Indian Bank, Thanjavur Junction Branch, Ground Floor, 1087 Mission Street, Thanjavur 613 001, represented by its Branch Manager / Authorised Officer.

5. G.Anusuya

6. T.Elangovan

7. Dr.Radhika Rani

8. E.Abinesh ...

Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the third respondent in Na.Ka.86/2018/A7, dated 30.07.2018 and quash the same and consequently forbearing the respondents herein from taking physical possession of ?M.V.K.Hospitals & Jeyam Pharmacy?, TS No.2767, 2771 Part & 2762, Therkalangam, Ward No.4, Thanjavur Town, from the petitioner.

                        
!For Petitioner              : Mr.Veera Kathiravan
                                                      Senior counsel for Mr.P.Vadivel
^For R1 to R3        : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan 
                                                       Special Government Pleader
                         For R4              : Mr.Pala Ramasamy         

:Order

[Order of the Court was made by T.RAJA,J.] This writ petition is directed against the impugned order passed by the Tahsildar, Thanjavur in Na.Ka.86/2018/A7, dated 30.07.2018.

2. The writ petitioner claiming to be a tenant of the hospital viz., M.V.K. Hospitals & Jeyam Pharmacy situated in T.S.No.2767, 2771 Part and 2762, Therkalangam, Ward No.4, Thanjavur Town, has come to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to interfere with the impugned order passed by the third respondent.

3. Asserting his right that he being a lawful tenant and running the aforementioned hospital, the third respondent cannot dispossess the petitioner without giving any notice whatsoever. The impugned order issued by the third respondent under the SARFAESI Act indicates that the District Collector, Thanjavur District and the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thanjavur / respondents 1 and 2 exercising their power under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act and passed an order to take physical possession of the property in question from the petitioner, at the instance of the sixth respondent Mr.T.Elangovan, for the dues payable by the fifth respondent G.Anusuya, behind his back, which is not permissible in the light of the ratio laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Vishal N.Kalsaria v. Bank of India and others reported in 2016 (2) SCC 452, followed by an order passed by the Division Bench in Writ Petition No.36504 of 2016, dated 20.10.2016 (Mohamed Jamaludin vs. State Bank of Travancore and others). Since Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, which has been amended on 12.06.2016 by inserting Section 4(A) of 2016 with effect from 01.09.2016, makes it clear that any person claiming to be a tenant or having leasehold right upon the secured asset has to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal to examine the facts of the case on evidence that such person is a lawful tenant, we are unable to entertain the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai. Since the petitioner claims that he is running the hospital with patients, we give 5 working days time from today to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai. Till then, status quo shall be maintained. This order is not passed on the merits but only on the ground that the petitioner claims to be running the hospital. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

To

1. The Election Commissioner, Tamil Nadu State Co-operative Societies, Election Commission, No.273, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.

2. The District Election Officer / Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Dindigul District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul Distsrict.

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Batlagundu Range, Dindigul District.

5. The Election Officer / Co-operative Sub Registrar, A.723 Batlagundu Co-operative Urabn Bank, Batlagundu, Dindigul District.

.