Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Sri Jagjit Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 August, 2010

Author: Jayanta Kumar Biswas

Bench: Jayanta Kumar Biswas

                                          1


                     In The High Court at Calcutta
                           Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                    Appellate Side


Present : The Hon'ble Mr Justice Jayanta Kumar Biswas

                             W.P.No.16365(W) of 2010
                                 Sri Jagjit Singh
                                       -vs-
                              Union of India & Ors.

        Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee
        Mr. Syed Nurul Arefin                           ....for the petitioner

        Mr. Uttam Kumar Majumder
        Mr. Debasish Kundu                          ....for the Union of India

Heard on : August 13, 2010 
 
Judgment on : August 13, 2010 

        The Court : The petitioner in this art.226 petition dated July 30, 2010 is
alleging that his application for passport under s.5 of the Passports Act, 1967
has not been disposed of by the passport authority in terms of provisions of sub-
s.(2) of s.5.

        Mr. Chatterjee, counsel for the petitioner, submits that the passport
authority was under a statutory obligation to dispose of the petitioner's
application for passport by an order in writing either issuing the passport or
refusing to issue the passport.     His submission is that the passport authority
could not sit tight over the matter.

        Mr. Majumdar, counsel for the respondents, submits that he has received

relevant records which will show that for good reasons the passport authority did not make any order. He says that if this Court orders, then the passport authority will make the order appropriately dealing with the petitioner's application for passport within the time specified by the Court.

2

The application was made as back as April 3, 2008. No amount of reason could empower or entitle the passport authority not to make an order in terms of the provisions of s.5(2) of the Passports Act, 1967. He was under an unqualified statutory duty to dispose of the application by an order in writing either issuing the passport or refusing to issue the passport. In my opinion, the petitioner's allegation of inaction is quite justified.

For these reasons, I dispose of the petition ordering as follows. The passport authority shall make the order in terms of s.5(2) of the Passports Act, 1967 within four weeks from the date of communication of this order and take steps in terms of s.5(3) of the Act regarding communication of the order to the petitioner. No costs. Certified xerox.

(Jayanta Kumar Biswas, J.) sb