Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Madras High Court

Devi Karthikeyan vs The Commissioner Of Police on 17 April, 2023

Bench: M.Sundar, M.Nirmal Kumar

                                                                         H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022

                                    THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 17.04.2023

                                                     CORAM

                                     THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
                                                    and
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

                                              H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022

                     Devi Karthikeyan
                     D/o.Muthu                                         .. Petitioner

                                                        Vs

                     1.The Commissioner of Police
                       Greater Chennai
                       Chennai – 600 007

                     2. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government
                        Home, Prohibition & Excise Department
                        Chennai – 600 009

                     3. The Superintendent
                        Central Prison
                        Puzhal, Chennai – 600 066

                     4. Inspector of Police
                        Team – 31, Bank Fraud Investigation Wing
                        Central Crime Branch-1
                        Greater Chennai Police
                        Vepery, Chennai – 600 007                      ... Respondents


                     Page Nos.1/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                       H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022

                                  Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
                     for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to produce the body of the
                     petitioner's husband namely R.Karthikeyan, aged about 48 years, who is
                     detained in 3rd respondent/the Superintendent, Central Prison-Puzhal,
                     Chennai before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith by calling for the
                     records pursuant to the detention order dated 12.10.2022 made in Memo
                     No.351/BCDFGISSSV/2022 on the file of the 1st respondent herein and
                     quash the same.


                                  For Petitioner           :     Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
                                                                 for Mr.B.L.S.Prasad

                                  For Respondents          :     Mr.R.Muniyapparaj
                                                                 Additional Public Prosecutor
                                                                 Assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John

                                                               ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] Captioned 'Habeas Corpus Petition' ['HCP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed by wife of detenu assailing a 'preventive detention order dated 12.10.2022 bearing reference No.351/BCDFGISSSV/2022' [hereinafter 'impugned detention order' for the sake of convenience and brevity]. To be noted, fourth respondent is the sponsoring authority and first respondent is Page Nos.2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022 the detaining authority as impugned detention order has been made by first respondent.

2.Impugned detention order has been made under 'The Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Cyber law offenders, Drug-offenders, Forest-offenders, Goondas, Immoral traffic offenders, Sand-offenders, Sexual-offenders, Slum-grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act No.14 of 1982)' [hereinafter 'Act 14 of 1982' for the sake of convenience and clarity] on the premise that the detenu is a 'Goonda' within the meaning of Section 2(f) of Act 14 of 1982.

3.There is no adverse case. The solitary case which is the sole substratum of the impugned detention order is Crime No.134 of 2022 on the file of Bank Fraud Investigation Wing, Central Crime Branch I, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery for alleged offences under Sections 120(B), 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of 'Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act 45 of 1860)' ['IPC' for brevity] . Owing to the nature of the challenge to the impugned detention order, it is not necessary to delve into the factual matrix or be Page Nos.3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022 detained further by facts.

4.Mr.Mohamed Riyaz, learned counsel appearing on behalf of counsel on record for petitioner and Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, learned State Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John, learned counsel for all respondents are before us.

5.Though several grounds have been urged in the support affidavit, learned counsel for petitioner at the hearing exhorted one point in his campaign against the impugned detention order and that one point turns on delay in considering a representation sent qua impugned detention order.

6.Responding to the aforementioned submission, learned State Additional Public Prosecutor submitted to the contrary and placed before us a list of dates and the details of the same are as follows:

                                  'Representation dated               ..    Nil

                                  Representation received on          ..    17.11.2022
                                  File submitted on                   ..    28.11.2022
                                  Under Secretary dealt with on       ..    28.11.2022
                                  Deputy Secretary dealt with on      ..    28.11.2022
                                  Minister dealt with on              ..    01.12.2022
                                  Rejected letter prepared on         ..    01.12.2022

                     Page Nos.4/8


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                         H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022

                                  Rejection letter sent to the detenu on..       01.12.2022
                                  Govt. Holidays falls on:

19.11.2022, 20.11.2022, 26.11.2022 and 27.11.2022 S.No. Representation Column 6 to 7 Column 9 to 10 1. No. of days 10 02

2. No. of holidays 04 -

No. of delay days 06 02

Total 8 days delay

7.We find that even if the intervening 4 public/Government holidays 19.11.2022, 20.11.2022, 26.11.2022 and 27.11.2022 are excluded, there is a delay of 8 days in considering the representation. We make it clear that the delay in considering the representation point in challenges to preventive detention orders cannot be decided quantitatively. It has to be decided qualitatively based on the facts, circumstances and the trajectory the representation has taken, in other words, it has to be decided on case to case basis. In the case on hand, we adopt such an approach and we find that 8 days delay vitiates the impugned detention order. We also hasten to make it clear that there can be no straight jacket formula in terms of number of days as regards this point is concerned and therefore, this order will not serve as precedent in all and every case.

Page Nos.5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022

8.Ergo, the sequitur is, captioned HCP is allowed. Impugned detention order dated 12.10.2022 bearing reference No.351/BCDFGISSSV/2022 made by the second respondent is set aside and the detenu Thiru.R.Karthikeyan, aged 48 years, son of Thiru.Rajamanickam, is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in connection with any other case / cases. There shall be no order as to costs.

                                                                      (M.S.,J.)        (M.N.K.,J.)
                                                                            17.04.2023
                     Index : Yes /No
                     Neutral Citation : Yes /No
                     Speaking Order/Non-speaking order
                     gpa

P.S: Registry to forthwith communicate this order to Jail authorities in Central Prison, Puzhal Page Nos.6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022 To

1.The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai Chennai – 600 007

2. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition & Excise Department Chennai – 600 009

3. The Superintendent Central Prison Puzhal, Chennai – 600 066

4. Inspector of Police Team – 31, Bank Fraud Investigation Wing Central Crime Branch-1 Greater Chennai Police Vepery, Chennai – 600 007

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page Nos.7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022 M.SUNDAR, J., and M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J., gpa H.C.P.No.2451 of 2022 17.04.2023 Page Nos.8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis