Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Kalyan Silks Trichur (P) Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner

Author: A.Muhamed Mustaque

Bench: A.Muhamed Mustaque

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                               PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

                  MONDAY,THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2015/22ND ASHADHA, 1937

                                   WP(C).No. 20956 of 2015 (T)
                                   ----------------------------------------




PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------

            KALYAN SILKS TRICHUR (P) LTD,
            KURIACHIRA, OLLUR, THRISSUR-680006,
            (REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR T.S.PATTABHIRAMAN).

            BY ADVS.SRI.K.N.SREEKUMARAN
                         SRI.P.D.UNNIKKANNAN NAIR
                         SMT.V.P.SEENA DEVI

RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------

1.          ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, SPECIAL CIRCLE,
            THRISSUR-685001.

2.         DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM-682015.

3.          INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
            COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR-688001.

4.          CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA,
            COMMERCIAL BRANCH, PADIVATTOM,
            ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-24.

5.          COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR,
             COMMERCIAL TAX CHECK POST,WALAYAR,
             PALAKKAD-676001.

            R1-3 & 5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN
            R4 BY ADVS. SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI (SR.)
                             SMT.S.AMBILY

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 13-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:


PJ

WP(C).No. 20956 of 2015 (T)
----------------------------------------

                                            APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS
-----------------------------------

P1:       COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 31/3/15 IN WPC.10382/15

P2:       COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE MONTHS OF 12/14 ISSUED BY
          THE R1

P3:       COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE MONTHS OF 1/2015 ISSUED BY
          THE R1

P4:       COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE MONTHS OF 2/2015 ISSUED BY
          THE R1

P5:       COPY OF THE APPEAL AGAINST EXT.P2 FILED BEFORE THE R2 ON 16/4/15

P5(A): COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL

P6:       COPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINST EXT.P3 BEFORE THE R2 16/4/15

P6(A): COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED IN EXTP6 APPEAL

P7:       COPY OF APPEAL FILED AGAINSTY EXT.P4 BEFOR THE R2 27/6/15

P7(A): COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED IN EXT.P5 APPEAL

P8:       COPY OF THE LETTERS DATED 18/3/15 & 29/6/15 ADDRESSD TO THE R1
          REGARDING PAYMENT OF 30% DEMAND WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

P9:       COPIES OF THE DEMAND NOTICES INFORM I UNDER THE KRR ACT BEARING
          NOS.A7 139/15 DATED 18/6/15 1370/15 DATED 17/6/15 AND A7-1590/2015 DATED
          1/7/15 ISSUED BY THE R3

P10:      COPY OF THE INTIMATION LETTER NO.BR/MISC/KSTPL/108/15-16 DATED
          3/7/15 ISSUED BY THE R4

P11:      COPY OF THE NOTICES BEARING NOS.OR 1786/9/15-16 DATED 8/7/15 AND OR
          2012/9/15-16 DATED 9/7/15 ISSUED BY THE R5


RESPONDENTS' EXHIBIT
------------------------------------

          NIL.

                                                          / TRUE COPY /


                                                          P.S. TO JUDGE

PJ



                    A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
          *****************************************************************************
                         W.P.(C) No.20956 of 2015
         ******************************************************************************
                  Dated this the 13th day of July, 2015

                                       JUDGMENT

The petitioner have approached this Court on account of detention of consignment based on the alert message given by the Authority regarding non-payment of arrears for the liability under Section 6A of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act based on turnover tax.

2. The petitioner have filed an appeal against the assessment and the appeal is pending. The petitioner claims that they have remitted 30% of the total demand, which is the subject matter of the pending appeal.

3. It is submitted that apart from detention of the consignment, 'Garneshi Order' has been served on the Bank. Ext.P10 is the communication.

Considering the facts and circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

i. The first respondent shall verify whether the petitioner have remitted 30% of the demand.
W.P.(C) No.20956 of 2015 2
ii. If the petitioner have remitted the above amount, their consignment shall not be detained pending the appeal.
iii. If the petitioner complies with the above directions, the Bank shall not freeze the account of the petitioner.
Sd/-
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln