Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

M/S. Merino Panel Products Ltd vs Designated Authority on 22 August, 2016

        

 
CUSTOMS EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,

West Block No.2, R.K.Puram, New Delhi



COURT-I



 Date of hearing/decision: 22.08.2016

 

Appeal No. AD/55586/2013

Appeal No. AD/stay/55818/2013

   



[Arising out of Notification No. 48/2012-Customs (ADD) dated 8.10.2012 issued by the Central Government based on Final Finding of Anti Dumping  Duties issued by the Designated Authority, Directorate General of Anti- Dumping  & Allied Duties, vide notification No. 14/35/2010-DGAD dt. 1.6.2012]





For approval and signature:	

Honble Mr. Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra, President

Hon'ble Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial)

Hon'ble Mr. B Ravichandran, Member (Technical)



1
Whether Press Reporters may be allowed to see the Order for publication as per Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982?



2
Whether it should be released under Rule 27 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 for publication in any authoritative report or not?
        
3
Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the Order?
       
4
Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities?
        
		



M/s. Merino Panel Products Ltd.                      	Appellants

			 



Vs. 



Designated Authority, 						Respondent

Directorate General of Anti-Dumping and Allied Duties/Ministry of Finance Appearance:

Present Shri Ankur Sharma, Advocate for the Appellant Present Shri Amit Singh, Advocate for the Designated Authority, Ministry of Commerce Present Shri Govind Dixit, A.R. for the Revenue Coram: Honble Mr. Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra, President Honble Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Judicial Member Honble Mr. B. Ravichandran, , Technical Member Final Order No. 53236 /2016 (AD) Per Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra:
Shri Ankur Sharma, learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that appeal may be treated as withdrawn.

2. Shri Amit Singh, learned advocate for Designated Authority, Shri Govind Dixit, learned A.R. for the Revenue have no objection.

3. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Justice Dr. Satish Chandra) President (Archana Wadhwa) Judicial Member (B. Ravichandran) Technical Member ss 2