Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Dilip Kumar Jain vs The Registrar Of Trademarks on 1 October, 2024

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

                                                                  (T)OP(TM)Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                 DATED: 01.10.2024

                                                      CORAM

                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                        (T)OP(TM) Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023
                                          (ORA/125, 233 to 235/2014/TM/CH)



                     Dilip Kumar Jain
                     Indian National Proprietor
                     Manibhadra Industries and Proprietor,
                     Sumeet Engineering Works, Pinto Apartments,
                     Near SBI, Vasco Goa.                                   ... Petitioner in
                                                                          all the (T)OP(TM)

                                                        -vs-



                     1. The Registrar of Trademarks,
                     Trademark Registry Branch Chennai,
                     IP India Buildings, GST Road,
                     Guindy, Chennai - 600 015.

                     2. Sumeet Appliances Private Limited,
                     Having its registered office at
                     Plot No. 315A, Kankai kripa, CHS,
                     Chikoowadi, Shimpoli Road,
                     Borivali, (West), Mumbai - 400 018.

                     1/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                               (T)OP(TM)Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023


                     3. Sumeet Machines Limited,
                     Having its registered office at
                     601-C, Poonam Chambers,
                     Shiv Sagar Estate, Dr.Annie Besant road,
                     Worli, Mumbai - 400 018
                     (Under Liquidation as per orders of
                     High Court of Bombay in
                     Company Petition No. 299 of 1994, dated June 17,2005)

                     4. The Official Liquidator,
                     High Court of Judicature at Bombay,
                     High Court Building,
                     Dr.Kane Road,
                     Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400 032.      ... Respondents 1 to 4 in
                                                                   all the (T)OP(TM)

                     5.Varkey Overseas Trading Company Private Limited,
                     Care of its Director
                     Mr.Aby George residing at
                     208, Oman Topaz, 65/2, Sarjapur Road,
                     Bangalore, 560 034,
                     Karnataka, India.                     ... 5th Respondent in
                                                      (T)OP(TM)Nos.146 to 148/2023


                     Prayer in (T)OP(TM)No.138 of 2023:       Transfer Original Petition
                     (Trade Marks) filed under Section 57(2) & 125 of the Trade Marks
                     Act, 1999, praying to revoke the trademark Sumeet in class 7 bearing
                     Trademark Registration No. 574504 which was assigned to and in
                     favour of the second respondent for the following grounds under
                     Section 57(2) namely that


                     2/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      (T)OP(TM)Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023


                                  (a). The impugned order is an entry made in the register
                     without sufficient cause and
                                  (b) The impugned order is an entry wrongfully made and
                     wrongly remaining on the register;
                                  (c). To award costs to the appellant as he has suffered legal
                     expenses due to the actions of the second respondent and direct the
                     second respondent to pay exemplary costs to the appellant.


                     Prayer in (T)OP(TM)No.146 of 2023:              Transfer Original Petition
                     (Trade Marks) filed under Section 57(2) & 125 of the Trade Marks
                     Act, 1999, praying to revoke the impugned trademark Sumeet in class
                     7 bearing Trademark Registration No. 263836 which was assigned to
                     and in favour of the second respondent for the following grounds
                     under Section 57(2) namely that
                                  (a). The impugned trademark No.263836 in Class 7 assigned to
                     the second respondent and standing in the name of the second
                     respondent is an entry made in the register without sufficient cause
                     and
                                  (b) The impugned trademark No.263836 in class 7 standing in
                     the name of the second respondent is an entry wrongfully made and
                     wrongly remaining on the register;


                     Prayer in (T)OP(TM)No.147 of 2023:              Transfer Original Petition

                     3/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      (T)OP(TM)Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023


                     (Trade Marks) filed under Section 57(2) & 125 of the Trade Marks
                     Act, 1999, praying to revoke the trademark Sumeet in class 9 bearing
                     Trademark Registration No. 574506 which was assigned to and in
                     favour of the second respondent for the following grounds under
                     Section 57(2) namely that
                                  (a). The impugned trademark No.574506 in Class 9 assigned to
                     the second respondent and standing in the name of the second
                     respondent is an entry made in the register without sufficient cause
                     and
                                  (b) The impugned trademark No.574506 in class 9 standing in
                     the name of the second respondent is an entry wrongfully made and
                     wrongly remaining on the register;
                                  (c). To award costs to the appellant as he has suffered legal
                     expenses due to the actions of the second respondent and direct the
                     second respondent to pay exemplary costs to the appellant.


                     Prayer in (T)OP(TM)No.148 of 2023:              Transfer Original Petition
                     (Trade Marks) filed under Section 57(2) & 125 of the Trade Marks
                     Act, 1999, praying to revoke the trademark Sumeet in class 11 bearing
                     Trademark Registration No. 574508 which was assigned to and in
                     favour of the second respondent for the following grounds under
                     Section 57(2) namely that



                     4/7


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      (T)OP(TM)Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023




                                  (a). The impugned trademark No.574508 in Class 11 assigned
                     to the second respondent and standing in the name of the second
                     respondent is an entry made in the register without sufficient cause
                     and
                                  (b) The impugned trademark No.574508 in class 11 standing in
                     the name of the second respondent is an entry wrongfully made and
                     wrongly remaining on the register;
                                  (c). To award costs to the appellant as he has suffered legal
                     expenses due to the actions of the second respondent and direct the
                     second respondent to pay exemplary costs to the appellant.



                                  In all the (T)OP(TM)

                                  For Petitioner   : Mr.Ramesh Ganapathy
                                                     for M/s. Mission Legal

                                  For R1           : Mr.S.Janarthanam, SPC

                                  For R4           : Mr.S.R.Sundar


                                                   COMMON ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed by the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner to withdraw 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (T)OP(TM)Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023 these petitions. An endorsement for such purpose has been made. By taking note of such endorsement, (T)OP(TM)Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023 are dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs.

01.10.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No kj To

1. The Registrar of Trademarks, Trademark Registry Branch Chennai, IP India Buildings, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai - 600 015.

2. The Official Liquidator, High Court of Judicature at Bombay, High Court Building, Dr.Kane Road, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400 032.

6/7

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis (T)OP(TM)Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J kj (T)OP(TM) Nos.138, 146 to 148 of 2023 (ORA/125, 233 to 235/2014/TM/CH) 01.10.2024 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis