Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bangalore District Court

Karnataka Bank Limited vs M/S.Tirumala Traders on 4 September, 2021

      IN THE COURT OF XXXV ADDL.CITY CIVIL &
        SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH­36)

   DATED ON THIS THE 4th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021

  Present: Sri.Sathisha.L.P., B.A.,L.L.B.,
           C/c XXXV Addl.CC & SS Judge, Bengaluru.

                  O.S.No.5279/2020

Plaintiff     :   Karnataka Bank Limited,
                  A Bank Company incorporated under
                  the Indian Companies Act, 1913,
                  carrying the Banking business having
                  its Registered and H. at Mahaveer at
                  Circle, P.B.No.599, Kankanady,
                  Mangaluru­575002 ad several
                  branches through out India and one
                  amongst them and Kengeri Satellite
                  Town Branch, Bengaluru­60.
                  Represented by its power of attorney
                  holder and Senior branch Manager
                  Sri.Madhu.K.S.
                  (By Sri.B.B.S.N., Advocate)

                            ­Vs­

Defendant     :   M/s.Tirumala Traders,
                  Rep by its Prop: Mr.Vasu Reddy,
                  S/o.Sri.Basava Reddy,
                  Aged about 47 years,
                  No.189/22/2­3­4­5/2,
                  Site No.3, KHB Colony,
                  Kengeri Satellite Town,
                  Bengaluru­560 060.

                  Also at
                   To:
                  Mr.Vasu Reddy,
                  Prop of M/s.Tirumala Traders,
                  No.4, Gandhinagar, 1st main,
                  1st cross, Near Mahaveer Cornet
                  Apartment, Kengeri Satellite Town,
                  Bengaluru­560 060.
                  (Exparte)
                         *****

Date of institution of the      : 21­10­2020
suit
Nature of the suit              :   Money suit

Date of commencement of
recording of the evidence       : 02­09­2021

Date on which the judgment      : 04­09­2021
was pronounced

Total duration                  : Years/s Month/s Day/s
                                   00      10      13




                                  (SATHISHA.L.P)
                              C/cXXXV Addl.City Civil &
                             Sessions Judge, Bengaluru

                       Judgment

     The Plaintiff ­ Bank has filed this suit against the

defendant for recovery of money.
                             3

      2.    In brief, the case of plaintiff ­ Bank is as

follows:­

      On 03­11­2017, the defendant has borrowed a sum

of Rs.5,00,000/­ (Five Lakhs) over draft facility and

Rs.4,00,000/­ (Four Lakhs) credit facility under DPN

facility, in all amounting to Rs.9,00,000/­ (Nine Lakhs)

from the plaintiff ­ Bank, for the business purpose of

Steel and Cement and for working capital for the

business of Steel and cement by executing necessary

documents and agreeing to pay interest at the rate of

15.70% p.a. compounded monthly. The defendant has

failed to pay the loan amount.     Hence, the plaintiff -

Bank issued a legal notice to the defendant, calling upon

it to pay the loan amount.      In spite of request, the

defendant has not paid the loan amount.        As on the

date of suit, the defendant is liable to pay a sum of

Rs.9,50,697­70/­ (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fifty Thousand Six
                                 4

Hundred and Ninety Seven).          Therefore, it is prayed to

decree the suit.


      3.      As could be seen from the order sheet,

dt: 26­7­2021, the defendant is placed exparte.


      4. The Senior Manager of the plaintiff - Bank one

Sri.Mahabaleshwar V Dixit, is examined as P.W.1 and got

marked Exs.P.1 to P.32.


      5. Heard.


      6. The points that arise for consideration are as

follows:­

            1. Whether the plaintiff ­ Bank is entitled
               for suit claim?

            2. What Order?


      7. My answer to the above points are as follows:­

            Point No.1    :     In the affirmative
                              5

         Point No.2   :      As per final order for the

following:­

                          REASONS

      8. Point No.1:­ The Senior Manager of plaintiff ­

Bank one Sri.Mahabaleshwar V Dixit is examined as

P.W.1. In his affidavit evidence, he has clearly explained

the transaction between the plaintiff ­ Bank and

defendant. He has deposed that the defendant has

availed Over Draft credit facility in all a amounting to

Rs.9,00,000/­ for the purpose of business of Steel and

Cement and working capital for Steel and Cement

business and executed necessary documents.         In his

evidence, Ex.P.1 is the notarized copy of Power of

Attorney Original seen and returned to witness, Ex.P.2 is

the credit sanction intimation dated 3­11­2017, Ex.P.3 is

the declaration dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.4 is the consent

letter dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.5 is the account opening

form dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.6 is the check collection
                             6

letter dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.7 is the application for

standing instruction dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.8 is the

Hypothication Agreement dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.9 is

the take delivery letter dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.10 is the

demand promissory note dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.11 is

the undertaking letter dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.12 is the

General Power of Attorney for Book Debts, Ex.P.13 is the

Declaration dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.14 is the consent

letter from the borrowers dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.15 is

the Account opening form dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.16 is

the Check collection letter dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.17 is

the Request to retain account No. of OD account dated

16­11­2017, Ex.P.18 is the take delivery letter dated

16­11­2017, Ex.P.19 is the demand promissory note

dated   16­11­2017,   Ex.P.20    is   the   Hypothication

agreement dated 16­11­2017, Ex.P.21 is the General

Power of Attorney for Book Debts, Ex.P.22 is the sanction

of credit facility intimation, Ex.P.23 is the request for
                              7

Over Draft and cash credit facilities, Ex.P.24 and Ex.P.25

are the office copies of the legal notice dated 15­11­2019,

Ex.P.26 & Ex.P.27 are the two returned RPAD covers,

Ex.P.26(a) and Ex.P.27(a) are the contents of RPAD

covers, Ex.P.28 and P.29 are the office copy of the Legal

notice   dated   23­11­2019,     Ex.P.30    is   the   postal

acknowledgment, Ex.P.31 is the Banker Book Evidence

Act certificate, Ex.P.32 is the Account Statement.     From

this, it is evident that the defendant has availed loan and

has not paid loan amount.           The defendant is placed

exparte. The oral and documentary evidence placed on

record is not challenged. Hence, point No.1 is answered

in the affirmative.


     9. Point No.2:­ In view of my answer to point No.1,

I proceed to pass the following:­


                         ORDER

Suit is decreed with cost. 8 The defendants are directed to pay a sum of Rs.9,50,698/­ (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fifty Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety Eight only) to the plaintiff ­ Bank within two months along with interest at the rate of 15.70% p.a. compounded monthly from the date of the suit till realization of entire amount.

Draw Decree accordingly. (Dictated to the Judgment­Writer, transcribed and typed by her and then corrected and pronounced by me in the open court on this the 4th day of September 2021) (SATHISHA.L.P) C/c XXXV Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru ANNEXURE Witnesses examined on behalf of the plaintiff.

P.W.1 : Sri.Mahabaleshwar V Dixit 9 Witnesses examined on behalf of the defendant.

­ Nil ­ Documents marked on behalf of the plaintiff. Ex.P.1 : Notarized copy of Power of Attorney Ex.P.2 : The credit sanction intimation dated 3­11­2017 Ex.P.3 : The declaration dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.4 : The consent letter dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.5 : The account opening form dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.6 : The check collection letter dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.7 : Application for standing instruction dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.8 : Hypothication Agreement dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.9 : Take delivery letter dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.10 : Demand promissory note dated 16­11­2017 10 Ex.P.11 : Undertaking Letter dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.12 : General Power of Attorney for Book Debts Ex.P.13 : Declaration dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.14 : Consent letter from the borrowers dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.15 : Account opening form dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.16 : Check collection letter dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.17 : Request to retain Account No.of OD account dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.18 : Take delivery letter dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.19 Demand Promissory note dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.20 : Hypothication Agreement dated 16­11­2017 Ex.P.21 : General Power of Attorney for Book Debts Ex.P.22 : Sanction of credit facility intimation Ex.P.23 : Request for Over Draft and cash credit facilities 11 Ex.P.24 : Office copy of the Legal notice dated & P.25 15­11­2019 Ex.P.26 : Two Returned RPAD covers & P.27 Ex.P.26(a) : Contents of RPAD covers & P.27(a) Ex.P.28 : Office copy of the Legal notice dated & P.29 23­11­2019 Ex.P.30 : Postal acknowledgment Ex.P.31 : Banker Book Evidence Act Certificate Ex.P.32 : Account Statement Documents marked on behalf of the defendant.

­ Nil ­ (SATHISHA.L.P.) C/c XXXV Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru 12 Judgment pronounced in open Court (Vide separate Judgment) ORDER Suit is decreed with cost. The defendants are directed to pay a sum of Rs.9,50,698/­ (Rupees Nine Lakhs Fifty Thousand Six Hundred and Ninety Eight only) to the plaintiff ­ Bank within two months along with interest at the rate of 15.70% p.a. compounded monthly from the date of the suit till realization of entire amount. Draw Decree accordingly. (SATHISHA.L.P) C/c XXXV Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru