Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

The Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Shri Kiran M Jadhav on 17 September, 2019

Author: S.N. Satyanarayana

Bench: S.N. Satyanarayana

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                 DHARWAD BENCH

 DATED THIS THE 17 T H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019

                        PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA

                           AND

      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL

               I.T.A. NO. 100129/2015
                        C/W
               I.T.A.NO.100128/2015,
               I.T.A.NO.100102/2015,
               I.T.A.NO.100104/2015,
               I.T.A.NO.100127/2015 &
               I.T.A.NO.100130/2015


IN I.T.A. NO. 100129/2015:


BETWEEN

1.    THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
      DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI

2.    THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
      WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.

                                        ... APPELLANTS
(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)

AND

M/S. PANCHAMUKHI BUILDERS
                             2




299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD,
BELAGAVI.
PAN: AAJFP2967L.
                                      ... RESPONDENT

(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)

    ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE
INCOME    TAX  ACT  1961,   PRAYING    TO   a)
FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW
STATED ABOVE; b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET
ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI, IN
ITA NO.268/PNJ/2014, DATED 12.03.2015 AND
CONFIRM    THE   ORDER    PASSED    BY    THE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.


IN I.T.A.NO.100128/2015:

BETWEEN

1.    THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
      DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.

2.    THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
      WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.
                                      ... APPELLANTS

(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)


AND

M/S. JAI GANESH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS,
299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD,
BELAGAVI.
PAN: AAFFJ7739L.
                                  ... RESPONDENT
                             3




(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)


    ITA FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE
INCOME-TAX    ACT,  1961   PRAYING   TO   a)
FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW
STATED ABOVE; b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET
ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH PANAJI, IN
ITA NO.275/PNJ/2014 DATED 12.03.2015 AND
CONFIRM    THE   ORDER   PASSED    BY   THE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.


IN I.T.A.NO.100102/2015:

BETWEEN

1.    THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
      DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
      BELAGAVI.

2.    THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
      WARD -1(1),BELAGAVI
      DIST: BELAGAVI.
                                      ... APPELLANTS

(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)


AND

SHRI KIRAN M JADHAV,
PROP: VIMAL BUILDERS,
299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD,
BELAGAVI.
PAN: ACTPJ5991L.
                                      ... RESPONDENT

(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
                             4




     ITA IS FILED U/S.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT
1961, PRAYING TO (a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL
QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (b) ALLOW THE
APPEAL AND SET - ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE
INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH
PANAJI, IN ITA NO.270/PNJ/2014, DTD:12.03.2015 AND
CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.


IN I.T.A.NO.100104/2015:
BETWEEN

1.    THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
      DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
      BELAGAVI.

2.    THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
      WARD -1(1), BELAGAVI
      DIST: BELAGAVI.
                                      ... APPELLANTS

(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)


AND

SHRI KIRAN M JADHAV,
PROP: VIMAL BUILDERS,
299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD,
BELAGAVI.
PAN: ACTPJ5991L.
                                      ... RESPONDENT

(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
                             5




    ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE
INCOME    TAX  ACT  1961,   PRAYING    TO   a)
FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW
STATED ABOVE; b) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET
ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN
ITA NO.272/PNJ/2014 DATED 12.03.2015 AND
CONFIRM    THE   ORDER    PASSED    BY    THE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.


IN I.T.A.NO.100127/2015:

BETWEEN

1.    THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
      DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.

2.    THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
      WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.
                                      ... APPELLANTS

(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)


AND

M/S. JAI GANESH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS,
299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD,
BELAGAVI.
PAN: AAFFJ7739L.
                                  ... RESPONDENT

(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)


     ITA IS FILED U/S.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT
1961, PRAYING TO (a) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL
QUESTION OF LAW STATED ABOVE; (b) ALLOW THE
APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE
                             6




INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH
PANAJI, IN ITA NO.274/PNJ/2014, DTD:12.03.2015 AND
CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM.


IN I.T.A.NO.100130/2015:

BETWEEN

1.    THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
      DR. B. R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI.

2.    THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
      WARD 1(1), BELAGAVI.
                                      ... APPELLANTS

(By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)


AND

M/S. PANCHAMUKDHI BUILDERS,
299/6, VIMAL GOODSHED ROAD,
BELAGAVI.
PAN: AAJFP2967L.
                                      ... RESPONDENT

(By SRI. SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)

     ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE
INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO a) FORMULATE THE
APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH,
PANAJI IN ITA NO.269/PNJ/2014 DATED 12.03.2015 AND
CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME (APPEALS), BELGAUM IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
                                   7




     THESE        APPEALS        COMING          ON     FOR    FINAL
HEARING,        THIS     DAY,    S.N.SATYANARAYANA ,                J,
DELIVERED THE F OLLOWING:


                          JUDGMENT

These appeals are in challenge to the revenue order granted in favour of the assessee.

The learned counsel for the appellants would bring to the notice of this Court that in the light of recent circular bearing No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, the present appeals do not survive, in view of the pecuniary limitation prescribed under the aforesaid circular, is in excess of challenge to the order impugned. Hence, he seek permission to withdraw the appeals filed by the revenue. Memo is accepted. Appellants are permitted to withdraw the appeals.

8

Accordingly, appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

SD/-

JUDGE SD/-

JUDGE KGK