Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 5]

Kerala High Court

Abbas vs State Of Kerala on 2 August, 2014

Author: Ashok Bhushan

Bench: A.M.Shaffique, Ashok Bhushan

       

  

  

 
 
               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                              PRESENT:

        THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN
                                  &
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

     SATURDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/29TH BHADRA, 1936

                    WP(C).No. 24087 of 2014 (I)
                    ----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
--------------

          1.  ABBAS, AGED 54 YEARS
       EX-SERVICE AND STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYER
       S/O.MYTHEENKANNU, RESIDING AT A.S.BUNGLOW, KALLAR P.O.
       VITHURA VILLAGE, PIN: 695 551.

          2.  ABDUL MAJEED, AGED 48 YEARS
       EX-SERVICE AND STATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYER
       S/O.MYTHEENKANNU, RESIDING AT MAJEED MANSIL
       BLOCK NO.75, KALLAR P.O., VITHURA
       PIN: 695 551.

          3.  MUMTHAS,
       W/O.ABDUL MAJEED, RESIDING AT MAJEED MANSIL
       BLOCK NO.75, KALLAR P.O., VITHURA
       PIN: 695 551.

          4.  ABDUL AZEEZ,
       S/O.MYTHEEN KANNU, RESIDING AT MAJEED MANSIL
       BLOCK NO.75, KALLAR P.O., VITHURA
       PIN: 695 551.

       BY ADVS.SRI.R.S.KALKURA
                        SMT.R.BINDU
                        SRI.M.S.KALESH
                        SRI.HARISH GOPINATH
                        SRI.JOHNSON JOSE PANJIKKARAN

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

          1. STATE OF KERALA
       REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT
       SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

          2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
       COLLECTORATE, KUDAPPANAKUNNU, TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

          3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
       VITHURA POLICE STATION, TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
       PALODE, TRIVANDRUM - 695 562.

          5. DEPUTY SUPERINTEDNENT OF POLICE,
       NEDUMANGAD, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT - 695 541.

                                   -2-

WP(C).No. 24087 of 2014

          6. B.SURESH KUMAR,
       SURESH BHAVAN, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          7. SURESH BABU,
       A.P.SADANAM, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          8. SURENDRAN NAIR,
       GEETHA BHAVAN, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          9. ARUN, GEETHA BHAVAN,
       KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD, TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          10. ANIL KUMAR,
       ANITHA BHAVAN, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          11. T.CHANDRAN, ANITHA BHAVAN,
       KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD, TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          12. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
       CHANDRAVILASOM, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          13. MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR,
       MADHU SADHANAM, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          14. GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR,
       SANTHOSH BHAVAN, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          15. SHYMKUMAR,
       SANTHOSH BHAVAN, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          16. SANTHOSH KUMAR,
       SANTHOSH BHAVAN, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          17. AJAYAKUMAR,
       PONNUS STORE, 26TH STONE, KALLAR
       NEDUMANGAD, TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

          18. S.VIJAYAN,
       VIJAYA MANDIRAM, KALLAR, NEDUMANGAD
       TRIVANDRUM - 695 551.

       R1 -R 5  BY ADV. STATE ATTORNEY
       R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
20-09-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 24087 of 2014 (I)
----------------------------

                              APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------


P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE

OFFICER BEARING NO.13163 DATED 2/8/2014.

P1(A): TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P1

P2: THE TRUE COPY OF OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY,

VITHURA GRAMA PANCHAYAT IN RESPECT OF THE OWNERSHIP OF THE BUILDING

BEARING V.P.VIII/986.

P2(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P2

P3: TRUE COPY OF THE PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE

OFFICER VITHURA DATED 10/9/2014 BEARING NO.02315.

P3(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.3

P4:THE TRUE COPY COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE

VITHURA  GRAMA  PANCHAYAT   IN  RESPECT  OF   THE  BUILDING   BEARING

NO.VIII/464 DATED 10/9/2014.

P5: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17/5/2010 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE

OFFICER VITHURA TO THE 6TH RESPONDENT.

P5(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.5

P6: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17/5/2010 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE

OFFICER VITHURA TO THE 12TH RESPONDENT.

P6(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.6

P7: TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER ADDRESSED TO THE

DISTRICT COLLECTOR.

P7(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.7

P8: TRUE COPY OF THE NEWS REPORT APPEARING IN MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY

DATED 17/4/2010.

P8(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.8

P9: THE TRUE COPY OF NEWSPAPER REPORT APPEARING IN THE MALAYALA

MANORAMA DATED 8/4/2010.

P9(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.9

P10: THE TRUE COPY OF NEWSPAPER REPORT APPEARING IN THE MALAYALA

MANORAMA DATED 12/1/2010.

P10(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.10

P11: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12/10/2010 IN WPC NO.31178/2010.

P12: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPAINT SUBMITTED BY THE THIRD PETITIONER

BEFORE THE VITHURA POLICE STATION DATED 1/4/2010.

P12(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.P12

                             -2-

WP(C).No. 24087 of 2014




P13: TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT REGISTERED BY THE

VITHURA  POLICE  STATION  IN  RESPECT  OF  F.I.R  NO.240/2014   DATED

1/4/2014.

P13(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT. P13.

P14: TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT REGISTERED BY THE

VITHURA  POLICE  STATION  IN  RESPECT  OF  F.I.R  NO.605/2014   DATED

20/7/2014.

P14(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.14

P15: TRUE COPY OF HTE COMPLAINT DATED 27/3/2010 SUBMITTED BY THE

SECOND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

P15(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.15

P16: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/8/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE

PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

P16(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT. 16.

P17: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/8/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE

PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

P17(A):TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.17

P18: TRUE COPY OF HTE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/8/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE

PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

P18(A): TRUE ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF EXT.18

P19: TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT EVIDENCING ISSUANCE OF EXT.P16

TO P18


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
------------------------


     NIL

                             /TRUE COPY/

                                               PS TO JUDGE



    ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag.CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J

          ----------------------------------------------

               W.P(C).No. 24087 of 2014

          ----------------------------------------------

         Dated this the 20th September, 2014

                         JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to respondents 6 to 18, in view of the order which is being passed.

2. By this Writ Petition the petitioners have prayed for a mandamus directing respondents 3 to 5 to afford sufficient police protection to the property of the petitioners against respondents 6 to 18. Allegation of the petitioners in the Writ Petition against the party respondents is that they are persons involving illegal sand mining and on the petitioners having opposed the illegal sand mining, they are against the petitioners.

3. The petitioners have filed a complaint against the private respondents, on which two crimes have already WP(C).24087/14 2 been registered, submits the learned State Attorney. The learned State Attorney further submits that the second petitioner is registered at the police station in the rowdy list. It is further submitted that there are criminal cases registered against the petitioners.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the criminal case registered was with regard to matrimonial dispute.

5. Be that as it may, on the petitioners' complaint, criminal cases are registered against the party respondents and the police is already making investigation in the said criminal cases. Second petitioner being entered into the rowdy list, we see no reason to issue any direction as prayed for. We only observe that the petitioners are at liberty to bring into the notice of the police authorities of any offence committed against them or take such recourse as permissible under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

WP(C).24087/14 3 With the above observation, the Writ Petition is closed.

ASHOK BHUSHAN ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE vgs20/9/14