Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court of India

Board Of Apprenticeship Training (Sr) ... vs M.Anbumani . And Ors. on 9 August, 2017

Bench: R. Banumathi, Kurian Joseph

                                                                                            NON-REPORTABLE
                                            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             CIVIL APPEAL NO.2776 OF 2009


                         BOARD OF APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING (SR) AND ANR.                         APPELLANT(S)

                                                             VERSUS

                         M. ANBUMANI AND ORS.                                                   RESPONDENT(S)

                                                     J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J.

Heard Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni, learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for the appellants and Mr. M.A. Krishnamoorthy, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1.

2. The simple issue arising in this appeal is, as to whether respondent No.1 would be entitled to pension, though he has not opted for that. It appears, taking note of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court has granted an order in his favour. As rightly pointed out by the learned Additional Solicitor General of India, pension is not available to a person who has not opted for the same, within the time permitted for the option.

3. However, having regard to the peculiar facts, as disclosed by the High Court in the judgment, we are of the view that this is a fit case where we should exercise our jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and retain the benefits granted to Respondent No.1 by the High Court.

4. Therefore, this appeal is disposed of making it clear that the impugned judgment shall not be treated Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by as a precedent as the same is rendered only on the NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2017.08.14 15:50:18 IST Reason: peculiar facts of the case and it shall not be treated as law for any other purpose.

1

5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

6. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [R. BANUMATHI] NEW DELHI;

AUGUST 09, 2017.





                               2
ITEM NO.108                 COURT NO.6                  SECTION XII

               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F       I N D I A
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2776/2009 BOARD OF APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING (SR) AND ANR. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M. ANBUMANI AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) Date : 09-08-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) Mr. A.N.S. Nadkarni,ASG Mr. C.B.N. Babu,Adv.
Mr. V. Rayudu,Adv.
Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. M.A. Krishna Moorthy, AOR Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy,Adv.
Ms. C. Rubavathi,Adv.
Mr. M. Vijaya Bhaskar, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed judgment.


(NARENDRA PRASAD)                                  (SUMAN JAIN)
 COURT MASTER                                      COURT MASTER

(Signed “Non-Reportable” Judgment is placed on the file) 3