Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

M/S New Trust Pharma vs Commercial Tax Officer on 25 August, 2016

Author: A.M. Shaffique

Bench: A.M.Shaffique

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

       TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1938

                                WP(C).No. 37340 of 2016 (N)
                               ------------------------------------------


PETITIONER(S) :
--------------------------

          1.        M/S NEW TRUST PHARMA,
                    REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER
                    SRI.BINOY CHANDRAN, RESIDING AT 5/80C,
                    KOZHUPARAMBIL BLOCK ROAD, VELLANGALORE P.O.

          2.        BINOY CHANDRAN
                    RESIDING AT 5/80C, KOZHUPARAMBIL BLOCK ROAD,
                    VELLANGALORE P.O.

          3.        ASAH CHANDRADAS
                    RESIDING AT 5/80C, KOZHUPARAMBIL BLOCK ROAD,
                    VELLANGALORE P.O.


                    BY ADVS. SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR
                             SRI.N.R.SAJ

RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------

          1.        COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER.
                    4TH CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682 018.

          2.        THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(APPEALS),
                    COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM, PIN- 682 018.

          3.        DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, (REVENUE RECOVERY),
                    MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK OFFICE,
                    ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN- 682 032.


                    BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. V.K.SHAMSUDHEEN

          THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
          ON 22-11-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
          FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 37340 of 2016 (N)
-----------------------------------------

                                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

EXHIBIT P1           TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE U/S 7
                      DATED 25-08-2016 BEARING COLLECTORATE FILE
                      NO.2016/47279/8.

EXHIBIT P2           TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE U/S 34
                     DATED 25-08-2016 BEARING COLLECTORATE FILE
                     NO.2016/47279/8.

EXHIBIT P3           TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE U/S 7
                     DATED 25-08-2016 BEARING COLLECTORATE FILE
                     NO.2016/47280/8.

EXHIBIT P4          TRUE COPY OF THE REVENUE RECOVERY NOTICE U/S 34
                     DATED 25-08-2016 BEARING COLLECTORATE FILE
                     NO.2016/47280/8.

EXHIBIT P5           TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 7-12-2015 FOR
                     THE YEAR 2013-14.

EXHIBIT P6           TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29-12-2015 FOR
                     THE YEAR AND 2014-15.

EXHIBIT P7          TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED AGAINST EXT.P5
                     ASSESSMENT ORDER.

EXHIBIT P8           TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED AGAINST EXT.P6
                     ASSESSMENT ORDER.

EXHIBIT P9          TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED IN EXT.P7 APPEAL.

EXHIBIT P10           TRUE COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED IN EXT.P8 APPEAL.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

                                                NIL

                                                        //TRUE COPY//


                                                        P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.



                    A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
              -------------------------------------
                  W.P.(C) No.37340 of 2016
               --------------------------------------
          Dated this the 22nd day of November, 2016


                           JUDGMENT

Petitioner has filed Exts.P7 & P8 appeals before the 2nd respondent and along with the appeals, petitioner has also filed Exts.P9 & P10, applications for stay. It is submitted that during the pendency of the appeals, steps are being taken by the respondent authorities for recovering the amount in terms of Exts.P1 to P4.

2. Having regard to the fact that appeals are pending before the competent authority, I do not think it necessary to consider the matter on merits. Suffice to say that the appellate authority has to consider the stay applications on merits within a specified time and in the meantime, the recovery can be kept in abeyance.

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as under:

(i) The 2nd respondent shall consider the applications for stay filed along with the appeals within a period of one W.P.(C) No.37340 of 2016 -2- month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
(ii) In the meantime, the demand made in terms of Exts.P1 to P4 shall be kept in abeyance.

Sd/-

A.M. SHAFFIQUE JUDGE Scl/23.11.2016