Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

Matrix Cellular (International) ... vs Syndicate Binders on 4 February, 2012

       IN THE COURT OF SHRI RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI, 
         ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE (SOUTH),
                   SAKET COURTS, NEW DELHI.
CS No. 06/2012
Unique Case ID No.  02406C0000582012
Matrix Cellular (International) Services Pvt. Ltd.,
07, Khullar Farms, 140, New Manglapuri, 
Mandi Road, Mehrauli, New Delhi 110 030.
                                                                       Plaintiff
                                    Versus
Syndicate Binders,
Regd. Office: B­166, Okhla Industrial Area,
Phase­I, New Delhi 110 020.
Also at: 
Syndicate Binders,
A­20, Hosiery Complex,
Phase­II, Extension, NOIDA - 201 305. 
                                                                    Defendant
DATE OF INSTITUTION                               : 04.01.2012
DATE OF RESERVING JUDGMENT                        : Not reserved.
DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT                             : 04.02.2012

        SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF A SUM OF Rs. 13,205/­
     (RUPEES THIRTEEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED AND 
           FIVE ONLY) UNDER ORDER XXXVII CPC.

                                JUDGMENT

1. This is a suit filed Under Order XXXVII of The Code of Civil Procedure (in short "CPC") by plaintiff company for recovery of CS No. 06/2012 Page No. 1 of 5 liquidated sum of Rs. 13,205/­ along with interest. After the summons of the suit were issued to defendant in the prescribed form as defined under Order 37 (2) (Sub Rule 2) CPC, defendant has not entered its appearance.

2. Defendant remained absent despite service of summons upon it at its addresses at B­166, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase­I, New Delhi 110 020 and at A­20, Hosiery Complex, Phase­II, Extension, NOIDA

- 201 305.

3. I have heard learned counsel for plaintiff at considerable length and have perused the record.

4. The plaintiff is a Private Limited company registered under The Companies Act, 1956 and dealing in International Mobile Rental Services having its registered office at 07, Khullar Farms, 140, New Manglapuri, Mandi Road, Mehrauli, New Delhi 110 030. The suit is instituted through Shri Chandra Shekhar, Executive, legal who has been authorized vide board resolution dated 27.1.2011 to sign and verify all pleadings on behalf of plaintiff company. It is stated that defendant had applied for International Mobile Connection in South Delhi and procured the Standard Application form containing the terms & conditions regarding the usage of connection. The defendant categorically signed a statement that it has read and understood the CS No. 06/2012 Page No. 2 of 5 terms & conditions of the Agreement Form dated 21.08.2008 and agreed to abide by them. On the basis of the information/statement furnished by the defendant in the Application Form, the plaintiff gave him International Mobile connection No. 07943643666 under the Agreement No. M510754. As per the accounts maintained by plaintiff company, an outstanding amount of Rs. 13,205/­ is due and payable by the defendants towards the International Mobile Connection No. 07943643666 but despite repeated reminders and requests, the defendant intentionally and deliberately failed to pay the same with ulterior motives. The suit is based on Agreement Form dated 21.08.2008, which is placed on record in original by plaintiff hence the same is covered within the provisions of Order XXXVII CPC and is also tendered within limitation.

5. There is no relief claimed by plaintiff which does not fall within the ambit of the provisions of Order, 37 CPC.

6. It is useful to refer the relevant provisions of law which are as under:­ Order XXXVII Rule 3(1) CPC.

(1) In a suit to which this Order applies, the plaintiff shall, together with the summons under rule 2, serve on the defendant a copy of the plaint and annexures thereto and the defendant may, at any time within ten days of such services, enter an appearance either in person or by pleader and, in CS No. 06/2012 Page No. 3 of 5 either case, he shall file in court an address for service of notice on him.
Order XXXVII Rule 2(3) CPC.
(3) The defendant shall not defend the suit referred to in sub­ rule(1) unless he enters an appearance and in default of his entering an appearance the allegations in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted and the plaintiff shall be entitled to a decree for any sum, not exceeding the sum mentioned in the summons, together with interest at the rate specified, if any, up to the date of the decree and such sum for costs as may be determined by the Hon'ble High Court from time to time by rules made in that behalf and such decree may be executed forthwith.

7. In view of the above mentioned provisions of law, it is clear that if the defendant makes default in entering its appearance within ten days from the date of service of summons upon it, the allegations as levelled in the plaint shall be deemed to be admitted and the plaintiff shall be entitled to a decree. As per record, the defendant stood served with the summons of the suit in prescribed proforma on 11.01.2012. Till date, no appearance has been entered into by the defendant and accordingly the allegations levelled in the plaint are deemed to be admitted by it, entitling the plaintiff to a decree straightway.

CS No. 06/2012 Page No. 4 of 5

8. The plaintiff has placed on record the original agreement form, account ledger of the defendant, legal notice dated 09.04.2011, Tariff plan, copy of passport and Visa of Users, company undertaking and itemized bills given to plaintiff for re­imbursement of the usage of the mobile number. From the documents placed on record by the plaintiff shows that a written contract was executed between the parties. The defendant availed the services of the plaintiff and undertook to make payment of the same. The defendant failed to make payment despite using the services of the plaintiff. The account of ledger of defendant shows that the defendant is liable to pay a sum of Rs. 13,205.67 for using the services of the plaintiff.

9. Hence, in the given circumstances, suit of the plaintiff is decreed with costs against defendant. Defendant is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 13,205/­ to the plaintiff with interest @ 8% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its realization. Decree­sheet be prepared. File be consigned to record room.

(Announced in open Court                    (RAJ KUMAR TRIPATHI)
on 04.02.2012)                      Additional Senior Civil Judge (South)
                                             Saket Courts, New Delhi.




CS No. 06/2012                                                      Page No. 5 of 5