Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Balbir Kaur vs State Of Punjab Etc on 22 April, 2019

Author: Rajan Gupta

Bench: Rajan Gupta

CWP No. 1296 of 2017                                                       1



      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH

                                                             CWP No. 1296 of 2017
                                                    Date of decision : 22.04.2019

Balbir Kaur
                                                         ....Petitioner

                                           V/s

State of Punjab & ors.
                                                         ....Respondents

BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA Present: Mr. Ranjivan Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Additional Advocate General, Punjab Mr. Jatinder Pal Singh, Advocate for respondent no 4. RAJAN GUPTA J.

Learned State counsel has referred to reply filed by Dr. Naresh Kumar, Director, Health Services (F.W.) Punjab and Annexure R-1 thereto. According to him, petitioner has been promoted with effect from the date her juniors were promoted. Para 1 of the said reply reads as under:-

"1. That the present petition has been filed by the petitioner, where in inter-alia she has prayed that she be promoted as Multipurpose health Supervisor (Female) over and above her junior. The claim of the petitioner has been considered and she has been promoted queue-wise and has also been promoted as Multipurpose Health Supervisor (Female) vide office order no. E-9(1)Pb.2017/5176 dated 29-12-2017. Thus, the present petition has become infructuous. A copy of this office order dated 29-12-2017 is appended herewith as Annexure R-1."

In view of above, present petition has been rendered infructuous. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is entitled to consequential benefits. He is, thus, given liberty to 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 28-04-2019 02:29:20 ::: CWP No. 1296 of 2017 2 file a representation in this regard which would be looked into by the competent authority.

Disposed of.

April 22, 2019                                        (RAJAN GUPTA)
Ajay                                                       JUDGE


       Whether speaking/reasoned:                     Yes/No

       Whether reportable:                            Yes/No




                               2 of 2
            ::: Downloaded on - 28-04-2019 02:29:21 :::