Delhi District Court
State vs . Anand Etc. on 28 May, 2019
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
Questions put to accused Anand S/o Sh. Chandru, who has been examined in
camera {Section 265B(4) Cr.P.C.}.
Q1 What is your name?
Ans. Anand
Q2 What is your father's name?
Ans. Late Sh. Chandru
Q3 What is your age?
Ans. 55 years.
Q4 What is your educational qualification?
Ans. I have studied upto 8th class.
Q5 Who are there in your family?
Ans. My wife, three daughters and one son.
Q6 Is there any other criminal case pending against you in any court?
Ans. No.
Q7 Have you been previously convicted of same offence by any court?
Ans. No.
Q8 Have you received the copy of charge sheet in the present case?
Ans. Yes.
Q9 Have you gone through the documents filed against you by the prosecution?
Ans. My lawyer has gone through the documents and has explained the same to me.
Q10 What is the case against you as you understand?
Ans. It is alleged against me that I alongwith coaccused persons had caused injury to
complainant namely Purshottam with iron rod and dandas.
Q11 Who has made you understand about your case?
Ans. My lawyer has explained and discussed the same with me.
Q12 Who has apprised you about the provisions of Plea Bargaining: Your lawyer,
Prosecution, Jail inmate or authorities or some body else ?
2
Ans. My lawyer has apprised me about the provisions of Plea Bargaining.
Q13 Do you know the contents of the application as well as affidavit filed by you ?
Ans. Yes, I know the contents of the application as well as affidavit filed by me.
Q14 Have you filed the application voluntarily without any force, fear or coercion?
Ans. Yes, application has been filed voluntarily and without any force, fear or coercion
by me.
Q15 Has any body coerced/induced you to enter into Plea Bargaining ?
Ans. No, nobody has coerced or induced me to enter into Plea Bargaining.
Q16 Do you know that you are not bound to file the present application and have a
right of complete trial ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that I am not bound to file the present application and I have a
right of complete trial.
Q17 Do you know that in the process of Plea Bargaining you would be asked to
participate in Mutually Satisfactory Disposition of the present case in which the
complainant/victim will also be a party ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that I shall be asked to participate in Mutually Satisfactory
Disposition of the present case in which complainant will also be a party.
Q18 Do you understand that by resorting to Plea Bargaining, you will forgo your right
to trial, right to confront the complainant/victim, right to bring witnesses in your defence
and right to be convicted by proof of your guilt beyond all reasonable doubt.
Ans. I understand that by resorting to Plea Bargaining, I will forgo my right to trial, right
to confront the complainant/victim, right to bring witnesses in my defence and right to
be convicted by proof of my guilt.
Q19 Do you understand that in the process of Plea Bargaining, you will have to admit
your guilt and plead guilty of the offence alleged to have been committed by you?
Ans. Yes, I understand that in the process of Plea Bargaining, I will have to admit my
guilt and plead guilty of the offence alleged to have been committed by me.
Q20 Are you aware that you are not bound and can not be compelled to make
admission of your guilt?
Ans. I am aware that I am not bound and can not be compelled to make admission of
my guilt.
3
Q21 Do you also understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into
Mutually Satisfactory Disposition, you may have to pay compensation to the
victim/injured/complainant as may be mutually agreed?
Ans. I know that I may be required to pay compensation to the complainant as may be
mutually agreed. Injured was my neighbour and we have settled the matter.
Q22 Do you also understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into
Mutually Satisfactory Disposition, you may be dealt with as per the provision of
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 or may be directed to face a sentence to the extent of
one half or one forth of the minimum sentence as prescribed under the law ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into Mutually
Satisfactory Disposition, I may be dealt with as per the provision of Probation of
Offenders Act, 1958 or may be directed to face a sentence to the extent of one half or
one fourth of the minimum sentence as prescribed under the law.
Q23 Do you understand that judgment delivered by the Plea Bargaining Judge in
terms of Mutually Satisfactory Disposition shall be final and no appeal shall lie in any
court against such judgment ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that judgment delivered by the Plea Bargaining Judge in terms
of Mutually Satisfactory Disposition shall be final and no appeal shall lie in any court
against such judgment.
Q24 How long have you been in judicial custody in this case?
Ans. I was not in custody in this case.
Q25 Do you want some time to think about this course of action?
Ans. No, I do not require time to think as I have already made up my mind.
Q26 Do you want to proceed with your application for Plea Bargaining?
Ans. Yes.
RO & AC (Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North)
Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
Questions put to accused Milan S/o Sh. Anand, who has been examined in
camera {Section 265B(4) Cr.P.C.}.
Q1 What is your name?
Ans. Milan
Q2 What is your father's name?
Ans. Sh. Anand
Q3 What is your age?
Ans. 22 years.
Q4 What is your educational qualification?
Ans. I have studied upto 12th class.
Q5 Who are there in your family?
Ans. My parents and three sisters.
Q6 Is there any other criminal case pending against you in any court?
Ans. No.
Q7 Have you been previously convicted of same offence by any court?
Ans. No.
Q8 Have you received the copy of charge sheet in the present case?
Ans. Yes.
Q9 Have you gone through the documents filed against you by the prosecution?
Ans. My lawyer has gone through the documents and has explained the same to me.
Q10 What is the case against you as you understand?
Ans. It is alleged against me that I alongwith coaccused persons had caused injury to
complainant namely Purshottam with iron rod and dandas.
Q11 Who has made you understand about your case?
Ans. My lawyer has explained and discussed the same with me.
Q12 Who has apprised you about the provisions of Plea Bargaining: Your lawyer,
Prosecution, Jail inmate or authorities or some body else ?
2
Ans. My lawyer has apprised me about the provisions of Plea Bargaining.
Q13 Do you know the contents of the application as well as affidavit filed by you ?
Ans. Yes, I know the contents of the application as well as affidavit filed by me.
Q14 Have you filed the application voluntarily without any force, fear or coercion?
Ans. Yes, application has been filed voluntarily and without any force, fear or coercion
by me.
Q15 Has any body coerced/induced you to enter into Plea Bargaining ?
Ans. No, nobody has coerced or induced me to enter into Plea Bargaining.
Q16 Do you know that you are not bound to file the present application and have a
right of complete trial ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that I am not bound to file the present application and I have a
right of complete trial.
Q17 Do you know that in the process of Plea Bargaining you would be asked to
participate in Mutually Satisfactory Disposition of the present case in which the
complainant/victim will also be a party ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that I shall be asked to participate in Mutually Satisfactory
Disposition of the present case in which complainant will also be a party.
Q18 Do you understand that by resorting to Plea Bargaining, you will forgo your right
to trial, right to confront the complainant/victim, right to bring witnesses in your defence
and right to be convicted by proof of your guilt beyond all reasonable doubt.
Ans. I understand that by resorting to Plea Bargaining, I will forgo my right to trial, right
to confront the complainant/victim, right to bring witnesses in my defence and right to
be convicted by proof of my guilt.
Q19 Do you understand that in the process of Plea Bargaining, you will have to admit
your guilt and plead guilty of the offence alleged to have been committed by you?
Ans. Yes, I understand that in the process of Plea Bargaining, I will have to admit my
guilt and plead guilty of the offence alleged to have been committed by me.
Q20 Are you aware that you are not bound and can not be compelled to make
admission of your guilt?
Ans. I am aware that I am not bound and can not be compelled to make admission of
my guilt.
3
Q21 Do you also understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into
Mutually Satisfactory Disposition, you may have to pay compensation to the
victim/injured/complainant as may be mutually agreed?
Ans. I know that I may be required to pay compensation to the complainant as may be
mutually agreed. Injured was my neighbour and we have settled the matter.
Q22 Do you also understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into
Mutually Satisfactory Disposition, you may be dealt with as per the provision of
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 or may be directed to face a sentence to the extent of
one half or one forth of the minimum sentence as prescribed under the law ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into Mutually
Satisfactory Disposition, I may be dealt with as per the provision of Probation of
Offenders Act, 1958 or may be directed to face a sentence to the extent of one half or
one fourth of the minimum sentence as prescribed under the law.
Q23 Do you understand that judgment delivered by the Plea Bargaining Judge in
terms of Mutually Satisfactory Disposition shall be final and no appeal shall lie in any
court against such judgment ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that judgment delivered by the Plea Bargaining Judge in terms
of Mutually Satisfactory Disposition shall be final and no appeal shall lie in any court
against such judgment.
Q24 How long have you been in judicial custody in this case?
Ans. I was not in custody in this case.
Q25 Do you want some time to think about this course of action?
Ans. No, I do not require time to think as I have already made up my mind.
Q26 Do you want to proceed with your application for Plea Bargaining?
Ans. Yes.
RO & AC (Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North)
Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
Questions put to accused Indresh W/o Anand , who has been examined in
camera {Section 265B(4) Cr.P.C.}.
Q1 What is your name?
Ans. Indresh
Q2 What is your father's name?
Ans. Sh. Anand
Q3 What is your age?
Ans. 45 years.
Q4 What is your educational qualification?
Ans. I am illiterate.
Q5 Who are there in your family?
Ans. My husband, three daughters and one son.
Q6 Is there any other criminal case pending against you in any court?
Ans. No.
Q7 Have you been previously convicted of same offence by any court?
Ans. No.
Q8 Have you received the copy of charge sheet in the present case?
Ans. Yes.
Q9 Have you gone through the documents filed against you by the prosecution?
Ans. My lawyer has gone through the documents and has explained the same to me.
Q10 What is the case against you as you understand?
Ans. It is alleged against me that I alongwith coaccused persons had caused injury to
complainant namely Purshottam with iron rod and dandas.
Q11 Who has made you understand about your case?
Ans. My lawyer has explained and discussed the same with me.
Q12 Who has apprised you about the provisions of Plea Bargaining: Your lawyer,
Prosecution, Jail inmate or authorities or some body else ?
2
Ans. My lawyer has apprised me about the provisions of Plea Bargaining.
Q13 Do you know the contents of the application as well as affidavit filed by you ?
Ans. Yes, I know the contents of the application as well as affidavit filed by me.
Q14 Have you filed the application voluntarily without any force, fear or coercion?
Ans. Yes, application has been filed voluntarily and without any force, fear or coercion
by me.
Q15 Has any body coerced/induced you to enter into Plea Bargaining ?
Ans. No, nobody has coerced or induced me to enter into Plea Bargaining.
Q16 Do you know that you are not bound to file the present application and have a
right of complete trial ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that I am not bound to file the present application and I have a
right of complete trial.
Q17 Do you know that in the process of Plea Bargaining you would be asked to
participate in Mutually Satisfactory Disposition of the present case in which the
complainant/victim will also be a party ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that I shall be asked to participate in Mutually Satisfactory
Disposition of the present case in which complainant will also be a party.
Q18 Do you understand that by resorting to Plea Bargaining, you will forgo your right
to trial, right to confront the complainant/victim, right to bring witnesses in your defence
and right to be convicted by proof of your guilt beyond all reasonable doubt.
Ans. I understand that by resorting to Plea Bargaining, I will forgo my right to trial, right
to confront the complainant/victim, right to bring witnesses in my defence and right to
be convicted by proof of my guilt.
Q19 Do you understand that in the process of Plea Bargaining, you will have to admit
your guilt and plead guilty of the offence alleged to have been committed by you?
Ans. Yes, I understand that in the process of Plea Bargaining, I will have to admit my
guilt and plead guilty of the offence alleged to have been committed by me.
Q20 Are you aware that you are not bound and can not be compelled to make
admission of your guilt?
Ans. I am aware that I am not bound and can not be compelled to make admission of
my guilt.
3
Q21 Do you also understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into
Mutually Satisfactory Disposition, you may have to pay compensation to the
victim/injured/complainant as may be mutually agreed?
Ans. I know that I may be required to pay compensation to the complainant as may be
mutually agreed. Injured was my neighbour and we have settled the matter.
Q22 Do you also understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into
Mutually Satisfactory Disposition, you may be dealt with as per the provision of
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 or may be directed to face a sentence to the extent of
one half or one forth of the minimum sentence as prescribed under the law ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that as a result of Plea Bargaining culminating into Mutually
Satisfactory Disposition, I may be dealt with as per the provision of Probation of
Offenders Act, 1958 or may be directed to face a sentence to the extent of one half or
one fourth of the minimum sentence as prescribed under the law.
Q23 Do you understand that judgment delivered by the Plea Bargaining Judge in
terms of Mutually Satisfactory Disposition shall be final and no appeal shall lie in any
court against such judgment ?
Ans. Yes, I understand that judgment delivered by the Plea Bargaining Judge in terms
of Mutually Satisfactory Disposition shall be final and no appeal shall lie in any court
against such judgment.
Q24 How long have you been in judicial custody in this case?
Ans. I was not in custody in this case.
Q25 Do you want some time to think about this course of action?
Ans. No, I do not require time to think as I have already made up my mind.
Q26 Do you want to proceed with your application for Plea Bargaining?
Ans. Yes.
RO & AC (Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North)
Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
Joint statement of accused persons namely (1) Anand S/o Late Sh. Chandru,
(2) Milan S/o Sh. Anand and (3) Indresh W/o Sh. Anand, all residents of Plot
No. 36, Om Vihar Colony, Akbarpur Majra, Delhi.
Without Oath:
We voluntarily plead guilty to the offences U/s 308/34 IPC. We pray
for a lesser sentence. We have amicably settled the matter with
complainant/injured as he is our close relative. According to said MSD, we shall
have no objection in case the lenient view is taken by the Court as regards the
imposition of sentence upon us. We fully understand that on basis of our plea of
guilt, the Court may award sentence for the offences as per law and that in case we
commit default in compliance with the conditions of the settlement and/or
undertaking given, the Court may enforce the same by imposing sentence in
default, we have agreed to this disposition voluntarily and without undue influence,
fear or coercion from any quarter.
RO & AC (Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North)
Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
Statement of complainant/victim namely Purshottam S/o Late Sh. Chandru.
ON SA:
I am the complainant/injured in the present case. I have compromised
the present matter with three accused persons namely Anand, Milan and Indresh
as per the MSD. According to said MSD, the accused persons have no objection in
case the lenient view is taken by the Court as regards the imposition of sentence
upon them. I have agreed to this disposition voluntarily and without undue
influence, fear or coercion from any quarter. I pray to this court to take a lenient
view against the said accused persons as they are my close relatives.
RO & AC (Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North)
Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
Statement of Ms. Neeta Gupta, Additional PP for State.
Without SA:
On behalf of the State, I agree to the conviction of the accused
persons and pray that they may be dealt with suitably as per the mutually
satisfactory disposition settled between the parties. As per the facts collected
during investigation, all the accused persons may be sentenced as per law.
RO & AC (Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North)
Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
Statement of SI Ravinder, No. D4968, presently posted at PS Vijay Vihar,
Delhi.
On SA:
I have already filed the previous conviction record of all the three
accused persons. As per record, all the three accused persons are not previously
convicted in respect of offences u/s 308/34 IPC in any other case. I agree to
conviction of the accused persons and pray that they be dealt with suitably as per
the mutually satisfactory disposition settled between the parties. As per the facts
collected during investigation, all the said accused persons may be sentenced as
per law.
RO & AC (Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North)
Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019
REPORT OF MUTUALLY SATISFACTORY DISPOSITION
& PROCEEDINGS THEREUPON U/S 265 DF of Cr.P.C.
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
28.05.2019
Present : Ms. Neeta Gupta, Ld. Additional PP for State .
Applicants/accused persons namely Anand, Milan and Indresh
on bail in person.
Ld. Counsel Sh. S.K. Tiwari, Advocate for all the accused
persons.
Complainant Purshottam also present alongwith his counsel.
IO SI Ravinder is also present.
All the three accused persons have been charged with offences
u/s 308/34 IPC. Consequent the application u/s 265B Cr.P.C. moved by the
applicants/accused persons to enter into plea bargaining, notices were
issued to the Ld. Additional PP, victim/complainant and the Investigating
officer to enter into negotiation to work out a mutually satisfactory disposition.
In order to ensure as to whether the remaining accused persons
have filed this application voluntarily, they were examined in Camera as
required by Section 265 B(4) Cr.P.C. where the other party, was not present.
After examining the said accused persons in camera
proceedings and after making necessary inquiry from them, this Court is
satisfied that the said applicants/accused persons have voluntarily moved
the application and have understood the nature of accusation/charges
leveled against them as also the nature and extent of punishment prescribed
under the law.
Contd. 2
2
The parties were duly apprised by this Court that the entire process
of negotiation has to be worked out in a free, fair and voluntarily manner
without any force, fear, undue influence or coercion and if, at any stage, they
or any of them entertains any doubt, the Court may be apprised of the same.
The parties have had meetings today i.e. 28.05.2019 in the
Court room. No one reported any untoward incident or use of undue
influence, fear, coercion, misrepresentation or fraud by one party on the
other.
The parties have now not reported that they have worked out
mutually satisfactory disposition of the case.
Therefore, this Court proceeds to record the statements of the
parties, IO and Ld. Additional PP.
(Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North)
Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019
ORDER:
Having heard the parties, Ld. counsel for the accused persons as well as Ld. Additional PP for State and IO, I find that the disposition mutually worked out by both the sides, is fair and just. Therefore, in terms of the mutually satisfactory disposition worked out by the parties, separate judgment has been passed whereby the accused persons namely Anand, Milan and Indresh have been convicted in respect of offences u/s 308/34 IPC and they are sentenced to be released on probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender's Act on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000/ each for a Contd. 3 3 period of one year and to observe good conduct and keep peace and not to indulge in any offence during the said period and if they commit any other offence during the said period, they shall be called upon to undergo sentence in this case.
It is further made clear that this sentence will not be a disqualification for the convicts in any manner in view of Section 12 of the Probation of Offender's Act.
File be consigned to record room.
Digitally signed by ASHUTOSHASHUTOSH (Ashutosh Kumar)KUMAR KUMAR Additional Sessions Judge:Date:
04 (North) 2019.05.29 11:55:53 +0530 Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019 IN THE COURT OF SHRI ASHUTOSH KUMAR: ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE04 (NORTH): ROHINI COURTS: DELHI Session Case No. 338/2018 Unique Case ID No. DLNT010052742018 State Vs. (1). Anand S/o Late Sh. Chandru (2). Milan W/o Sh. Anand (3). Smt. Indresh W/o Sh. Anand All residents of Plot No. 36, Om Vihar, Village Akbar Pur Majra, Delhi36.FIR No. : 361/2017
Police Station : Alipur Under Sections : 308/34 IPC Date of committal to Sessions Court: 01.06.2018 Date on which judgment was reserved: 28.05.2019 Date on which Judgment pronounced: 28.05.2019 JUDGMENT:
The accused persons had been facing trial in respect of offences U/s 308/34 IPC on the allegations that on 17.06.2016, at about 9:15 am at plot no. 36, Om Vihar Colony, Village Akbar Pur Majra, Delhi, all of them in furtherance of their common intention gave beatings to complainant / victim Sh.
Purshottam with iron rod and dandas on his head causing injuries to him.
After completion of investigation, chargesheet had been filed before the Court. After compliance of section 207 Cr.P.C., the case was committed to the Court of Sessions and was assigned to this Court.
After hearing arguments on the point of charge, this Court was pleased to frame the charges u/s 308/34 IPC against all the three accused persons to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
The accused persons were put to trial after framing of charges against them as stated above. However, during pendency of trial, accused persons moved an application U/s 265(B) Cr.P.C. for entering into plea bargaining.
All the three accused persons were examined in Camera by the Court in order to ascertain their voluntariness in moving the aforesaid application. During said Camera proceedings, said accused persons admitted their guilt and claimed that they wanted to avail the benefit of Chapter XXIA of Cr.P.C. by taking recourse to the Plea Bargaining. The Court was prima facie satisfied that the charges against them are well founded.
Thereafter, all the relevant stake holders were put to notice and after having due deliberation between them, they arrived at Mutually Satisfactory Disposition (MSD) which was brought before the Court. The entire process was free and fair. The terms and conditions of MSD were found to have been arrived at by all the sides voluntarily and accordingly, the statements of all the relevant stake holders were recorded before the Court.
In view of the plea of guilty made by accused persons namely Anand, Milan and Indresh and in view of MSD arrived at between the parties, said three accused persons are convicted for the offences u/s 308/34 IPC.
Announced in open Court today
dt. 28.05.2019 (Ashutosh Kumar)
Additional Sessions Judge04
North District, Rohini Courts,
Delhi
State Vs. Anand Etc.
FIR No. 361/2017
PS Alipur
U/s 308/34 IPC
ORDER ON SENTENCE
28.05.2019
Present : Ms. Neeta Gupta, Ld. Additional PP for State .
Complainant /victim namely Purshottam in person with his Counsel.
Convicts namely Anand, Milan and Indresh in person with their Ld. Counsel.
Argument on the point of sentence heard. Record perused. Complainant Sh. Purshottam has also made a request to take a lenient view against the convicts by stating that both the sides want to live a peaceful life without any disturbance. It is also stated that the convicts are not previously convicted in any other case and their antecedents are clear.
Ld. Addl. PP submits that appropriate sentence may be awarded in view of the allegations appearing against them.
All three convicts have come forward to admit their guilt by moving an application U/s 265B Cr.P.C. and after having due deliberations between all the relevant stake holders, they have arrived at MSD. There is nothing on record which could show that convicts are previously involved in any other criminal case. As per the MSD, both the parties have amicably settled their dispute and now, they want to live happily without having any grudge against each other.
In these circumstances, no purpose would be served by sending the convicts behind the bar. Keeping in view the nature of the offence and Contd. 2 2 over all facts and circumstances of the present case as stated herein above and also economic, social family background of the convicts, for conviction qua the offences u/s 308/34 IPC, they are sentenced to be released on probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offender's Act on furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000/ each for a period of one year and to observe good conduct and keep peace and not to indulge in any offence during the said period and if they commit any other offence duirng the said period, they shall be called upon to undergo sentence in this case.
It is further made clear that this sentence will not be a disqualification for the convicts in any manner in view of Section 12 of the Probation of Offender's Act.
Copy of this judgment be given to the parties free of cost. Surety bonds stand discharged. Documents, if any, of the sureties be released after cancellation of endorsement, if any.
File be consigned to record room.
(Ashutosh Kumar) Additional Sessions Judge: 04 (North) Rohini Courts: Delhi: 28.05.2019