Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court of India

Rakesh Kumar Garg vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 24 August, 2017

Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2018 SC 512

Author: Kurian Joseph

Bench: R. Banumathi, Kurian Joseph

                                                                                                  NON-REPORTABLE
                                            IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                          CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10857 OF 2017
        [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 15572 OF 2017 @ CC NO.9610/2017]


                         RAKESH KUMAR GARG                                                  APPELLANT(S)

                                                              VERSUS

                         STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.                                      RESPONDENT(S)


                                                     J U D G M E N T

KURIAN, J.

Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellant approached this Court praying for continuance in service up to the age of 60 years, beyond the normal age of superannuation of 58 years, on the main ground that in New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) the State Government has permitted the officers to continue in service up to 60 years of age and the Regulations have been amended accordingly.

4. Mr. D.K. Singh, learned Additional Advocate General for the State of U.P. points out that as far as Gorakhpur Industrial Development Authority is concerned the State Government has declined permission for considering the proposal for continuance in service up to 60 years of age and amendment of its Regulation accordingly.

5. In that view of the matter, the appeal is disposed of, without prejudice to the liberty Signature Not Verified available to the appellant to challenge the order Digitally signed by NARENDRA PRASAD Date: 2017.09.16 passed by the Government.

14:23:26 IST Reason:

6. Needless to say that in case the order is so challenged, it will be considered on its own merits.

1

7. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

8. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [R. BANUMATHI] NEW DELHI;

AUGUST 24, 2017.

2