Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Shri Rajendra B. Dangare vs Shri Bashir Ali Shaikh, on 23 September, 2014

  
 
 
 
 
 
 BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
  
 
 







 



 
   
   
   


   
     
     
     

BEFORE THE
    HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 
    
   
    
     
     

COMMISSION,  MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
    
   
  
  
   

 
  
 
  
   
   

 
  
 
  
   
   
     
     
     
       
       
       

First Appeal
      No. A/00/59
      
     
      
       
       

(Arisen out
      of Order Dated 07/12/1999 in Case No.92/98 of District Forum, Satara)
      
     
    
     

 
    
   
    
     
     

 
    
   
    
     
     
       
       
       
         
         
         

Shri Rajendra
        B. Dangare,
         

District Fishery Development Officer,
         

  Zilla  Parishad  New
          Building, 2nd
        floor,
         

Ward No.12, Satara.
        
       
      
       

 
      
       
       

...........Appellant(s)
      
     
      
       
       

  
      
       
       

  
      
     
      
       
       

 Versus 
      
       
       

  
      
     
      
       
       
         
         
         

Shri Bashir
        Ali Shaikh,
         

R/o.478(A), Guruwar Peth, South of L.B.S.College,
        
       
        
         
         

Satara.
        
       
      
       

 
      
       
       

...........Respondent(s)
 

BEFORE:

   
HON'BLE MR. P.B.Joshi, PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE MR. Narendra Kawde, MEMBER   For the Appellant:
None   For the Respondent:
None   ORDER Per Honble Mr.Narendra Kawde, Member [1] This appeal was lying on sine-die list which was taken out. Notices were issued to both the parties. Notice of the appellant is returned back with endorsement left. Notice sent to the respondent is duly served. Present appeal is pending since 2000. No latest address of the appellant is available with this Commission. Appellant has not informed its latest address to the Commission. It is not desirable to prolong the old matter when the appellant is not interested to contest the appeal diligently. No one turned up on behalf of the appellant to make enquiry about progress of this appeal. Hence, appeal stands dismissed in default. No order as to costs.
 
Pronounced on 23rd September, 2014.
   
[HON'BLE MR. P.B.Joshi] PRESIDING MEMBER     [HON'BLE MR. Narendra Kawde] MEMBER pgg