Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Cochin

Sibin Kuriakose,Kokkottu vs Ito,Non-Crp Ward 1(4), Kochi on 23 October, 2024

        IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                 COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN

  Before Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member &
        Shri Amarjit Singh, Accountant Member

     ITA No.828/Coch/2023 : Asst.Year 2016-2017
                SA N o.183/Coch/2023

Sri.Sibin Kuriakose                         The Income Tax Officer
Kokkottu, Kunnathunadu               v.     Ward 1(4)
Thiruvaniyoor, Kuzhiyara PO                 Kochi.
Ernakulam - 682 312.
PAN : CLYPK3536N.
    (Appellant/Applicant)                          (Respondent)

             Appellant/Applicant by : --- None ---
            Respondent by : Dr. S. Pandian, CIT-DR

                                          Date of
Date of Hearing : 23.08.2024              Pronouncement : 23.10.2024

                              ORDER

Per Bench :

This assessee's appeal in ITA No.828/Coch/2023 (alongwith its stay application SA No.183/Coch/2023 therein) for assessment years 2016-2017 arises out of the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) / NFAC vide DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1052373982(1) dated 26.04.2023 in proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short "the Act" hereinafter.

Case called twice. None appears at assessee's behest. It is accordingly proceeded ex parte.

2 ITA No.828/Coch/2023 & SA No.183/Coch/2023.

Sri.Sibin Kuriakose.

2. It emerges during the course of hearing that the CIT(A)/NFAC has noted the assessee's continuous non- appearance in the lower appellate proceedings before rejecting the assessee's contentions vide ex-parte order under challenge. Learned Sr.DR could hardly dispute the clinching fact that the NFAC's order has nowhere decided the assessee's substantive grounds on merits as contemplated u/sec.250(6) of the Act requiring it to give points for determination followed by a detailed adjudication thereof. Faced with the situation, we deem it appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore the assessee's instant appeal back to the CIT(A))/NFAC for it's afresh adjudication, preferably within three effective opportunities of hearing, subject to the rider that it shall be the taxpayer's onus and responsibility only to file and prove all the relevant facts in consequential proceedings. Assessee's appeal ITA No.828/Coch/2023 is allowed for statistical purposes in very terms is allowed for statistical purposes in very terms and the corresponding stay application No.183/Coch/2023 is dismissed as rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. A copy of the common order be placed in the respective case files.

Order pronounced in the open court on this 23rd Day of October, 2024.

                   Sd/-                                           Sd/-
      (Amarjit Singh)             (Satbeer Singh Godara)
  ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                  JUDICIAL MEMBER
Cochin ; Dated : 23rd October, 2023.
Devadas G*
                                    3
                                  ITA No.828/Coch/2023 & SA No.183/Coch/2023.
                                                           Sri.Sibin Kuriakose.


Copy to :
1.    The Appellant.
2.    The Respondent.
3.    The CIT Concerned.
4.    The DR, ITAT, Cochin.
5.    Guard File.

                              Asst. Registrar/ITAT, Cochin