Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Thomas T.T vs State Of Kerala on 15 October, 2012

Author: Antony Dominic

Bench: Antony Dominic

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

               THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

         MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2012/23RD ASWINA 1934

                      WP(C).No. 16651 of 2012 (F)
                      ---------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
-------------

         THOMAS T.T, AGED 60 YEARS
         THEKKEVATTAPARAMBIL HOUSE KOTHANALLORE P.O KOTTAYAM 686632

         BY ADV. SRI.TITUS MANI

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

     1.  STATE OF KERALA
         REPRESENTED BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY SECRETARIAT TRIVANDRUM
         695001

     2.  STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE
         REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER P.B. NO.34POOJAPURA
         TRIVANDRUM 695012

           BY  SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPPEN
           BY SRI.R.S.KALKURA, SC FOR BANK

        THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)    HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION   ON
15-10-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WPC NO.16651/12


                            APPENDIX


PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS



EXT.P1   TRUE COPY OF THE R.R. NOTICE U/S 7 OF THE ACT DT 25-06-2012

EXT.P2   TRUE COPY OF THE R.R. NOTICE U/S 34 OF THE ACT DT 25-06-12

EXT.P3   TRUE COPY OF RBI NOTIFICATION DT 28-04-2001




                         //True Copy//


                                      PA to Judge
Rp



                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                    ================
                  W.P.(C) NO. 16651 OF 2012
                  ===================

            Dated this the 15th day of October, 2012

                         J U D G M E N T

The issue raised in this writ petition is regarding the liability of the parent of a loanee of an educational loan to be proceeded against for recovery of the dues. It is seen that in the judgment in WA No.974/12, a Division Bench of this Court has already upheld such action reversing the judgment in Vasantha Kumari v. State Bank of Travancore (2012(1) KLT 755) relied on by the petitioner.

In that view, there is no merit in this writ petition. Writ petition is dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp