Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

E. Rajarathnakar vs Kanagiri Lingam on 3 November, 2025

Author: Dipankar Datta

Bench: Dipankar Datta

                                                          1

     ITEM NO.55                                 COURT NO.9                    SECTION II

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 867/2025

     [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-03-2024
     in CRLP No. 3209/2024 passed by the High Court for The State of
     Telangana at Hyderabad]

     E. RAJARATHNAKAR                                                          Petitioner(s)

                                                         VERSUS

     KANAGIRI LINGAM & ORS.                                                    Respondent(s)
     IA No. 7064/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

     Date : 03-11-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

     For Petitioner(s) :Mr. Harsha Gollamudi, Adv.
                        Mr. Dawneesh Shaktivats, AOR
                        Mr. Yeshwant, Adv.
                        Mr. Aman Sabir Saifi, Adv.
                        Mr. Mohd Yasin, Adv.
                        Ms. Himanshi Mehta, Adv.

     For Respondent(s) :Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR
                        Mr. Akshay Singh, Adv.

                                         Ms. Devina Sehgal, AOR
                                         Mr. Srikanth Varma Mudunuru, Adv.
                                         Mr. Yatharth Kansal, Adv.

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

1. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. We are not inclined to dispose of the special leave petition at this stage having regard to a prima facie satisfaction formed by us that an incorrect Signature Not Verified representation was made by learned counsel for the respondents to the effect Digitally signed by JATINDER KAUR Date: 2025.11.04 17:35:57 IST that the order dated 17th January, 2024 has dismissed the application under Reason:

Section 216(1), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On the contrary, the order 2 dated 17th January, 2024, which has since been placed on record, reveals that an application filed by the petitioner seeking permission to be represented by his own counsel came to be rejected.

3. Be that as it may, there shall be stay of the proceedings before the trial court till such time the High Court decides Criminal Petition No. 11798 of 2024.

4. We hope and trust that the High Court shall decide such petition as expeditiously as possible, preferably within four months from date.

5. Relist the special leave petition after four months.

(JATINDER KAUR)                                      (SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA)
P.S. to REGISTRAR                                      COURT MASTER (NSH)