Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Rushil Decor Limited vs The Karnataka Power Transmission on 13 March, 2017

Author: Raghvendra S.Chauhan

Bench: Raghvendra S. Chauhan

                                  1


        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

           DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2017

                             BEFORE

     THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN

              Writ Petition No.46981/2013 (GM-KEB)

Between :

M/s. Rushil Decor Limited
A Limited Company registered under
The Indian Companies Act, 1956,
No.1, Krinkal Apartments,
Opp: Mahalakshmi Temple,
Mahalakshmi Society, Paldi,
Aurangabad-380007,
Represented by its
Authorized Signatory,
Sri Ramaganapathy,
Assistant General Manager (Electrical).         ...Petitioner

(By Sri Devi Prasad Shetty, Advocate)

And :

1.      The Karnataka Power Transmission
        Corporation Limited,
        (A Government of Karnataka
        Undertaking),
        Kaveri Bhavan, 2nd Floor,
        K. G. Road, Bangalore,
        Represented by its
        Chairman/Managing Director.

2.      The Executive Engineer (Electrical)
        Chikamagalur Major Works Division,
        Karnataka Power Transmission
        Corporation Ltd.,
        M.R.S. Complex, B. H. Road,
        Shimoga.
                                    2


3.      M/s. Emit Corporation
        Post Box No.2062,
        No.808/2, 1st Cross,
        Seshadripuram College Road,
        Bangalore,
        Represented by its Proprietrix,
        Mrs. Madhavi S. Chakravarthy.                ...Respondents

(By Sri N. K. Gupta, Advocate for R-1 & R-2;
    Sri Ravishankar, Advocate for R-3)

      This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the
Constitution of India praying to direct the 2nd respondent to provide
continuous power supply of 66 KV to the installation bearing
R.R.No.REHT-1 in the Petitioner's establishment and etc.

      This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing in 'B'
group this day, the Court made the following :


                               ORDER

Mr. Devi Prasad Shetty, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has submitted a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition.

The memo shall be taken on record. The Petition is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE *bk/-