Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Karnataka High Court

Ramesh S/O Gangaram Pawale vs Laxmibai W/O Baburao Jadhav on 7 December, 2011

Bench: K.L.Manjunath, K.Govindarajulu

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

             CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

       DATED THIS THE   7th   DAY OF DECEMBER 2011
                      PRESENT
       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. L. MANJUNATH

                          AND
    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJULU

                   p234Q11CIVIL
BETWEEN:

SRI. RAMESH
S/O GANGARAM PAWALE,
AGE: 46 YEARS, 0CC: BUSINESS.
R/0 CTS NO.1143, ANANTSHAYAN GALLI,
BELGUM.
                                          COMPLAINANT
(BY SR1.G.B.SHASTRY, ADV.,)

AND:

SMT. LAXMIBAI,
W/O BABURAO JADHAV,
AGE: MAJOR, CCC: BUSINESS,
R/O 653/lA, NARGUNDAKAR
BHAVE CHOWK. RAVI WAR PETH,
BELGAUM.
                                             ACCUSED
(BY SRI.V.P. KULKARNI, ADV.)

     THIS CCC IS FILED U/S. 11 AND 12 R/W. ARTICLE
215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA OF THE CONTEMPT OF
COURTS    ACT,  PRAYING   TC)  INITIATE  CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR HAVING
COMMITFED CONTEMPT BY NOT COMPLYING THE TERMS
OF UNDERTAKING ON AFFIDAVIT DATED: 05.02.2009 AS
  PER ORDER DATED: 06.01.2009 PASSED BY THIS
 HON'BLE COURT TN RSA NO.5147/2008 PRODUCED
                                             AS
 ANNEXURES-A AND B AND THE ACCUSED MAY
                                             BE
 DIRECTED TO HAND OVER THE POSSESSION OP
                                            THE
 SUIT PROPERTY FORTHWITH TO THE COMPLAINANT
                                            AND
 PUNISH THE ACCUSED.

      THIS    APPEAL      COMING   ON   FOR    FRAMING     OP
 CHARGES THIS      DAY,    K.L.MANJUNATH, J,     MADE THE
 FOLLOWING:

                             ORDER

The matter is listed for framing of charges. The respondent is present before the Court. She tenders unconditional apology. She has filed a memo to that effect. According to her she is an illiterate lady and was incapable of understanding the orders of the Cou rt.

She has stated that she has overstayed illegally for 21 months and she is willing to pay the rent for the perio d of 2 1 months for her overstay.

2. We accept the statement made by the respondent who is present before the Court,

3. In view of tendering unconditional apoloT before the Court and agreed to pay arrears of rent for a :3: period of 21 months to the petitioner, the petition is closed.



                                         Sd.!



                                       Sd/
GH                                   JUDGE