Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mukesh Makandas Mehta vs The State Of Maharashtra on 25 November, 2020

Author: Sarang V. Kotwal

Bench: Sarang V. Kotwal

                                                                  :1:                       04-ia-st-4959-20.odt



                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) 4959 OF 2020
                                                          IN
                                  ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 3112 OF 2020

                            Mukesh Makandas Mehta                                   .... Applicant
                                      Versus
                            The State of Maharashtra                                .... Respondent

                                                           ______
                            Ms. Mansha Khemka i/b. Khemka & Asso. for the Applicant.
                            Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for State/Respondent.
                                                           ______

                                                               CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2020 P.C. :

1. This is an interim application filed in Anticipatory Bail Application (Stamp) No.3112/2020. The Application was disposed of vide order dated 23.10.2020.
2. In the present application, following prayer is made :
"(a) That, this Honourable Court may be pleased to pass orders modifying the order dated 23.10.2020 in Anticipatory Bail Application No.3112 of 2020 of this Honourable Court by observing that the observations made by the Hon'ble High Court in order dated 23.10.2020 are limited to the Applicant's case Digitally for anticipatory bail."

signed by Pradeepkumar Pradeepkumar P. Deshmane P. Deshmane Date:

2020.11.26 15:37:52 +0530 1 of 2 Deshmane(PS) :2: 04-ia-st-4959-20.odt
3. I do not see any reason to modify the order dated 23.10.2020. It is obvious that the order was passed in anticipatory bail application at that stage. No further clarification is necessary.

Interim Application is, therefore, rejected and is accordingly disposed of.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Deshmane (PS) 2 of 2