Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

M/S. Moms Cradle Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 22 March, 2022

Author: Mukta Gupta

Bench: Mukta Gupta, Neena Bansal Krishna

                          $~3
                          *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +      W.P.(C) 3614/2022
                                 M/S. MOMS CRADLE PVT. LTD.           ..... Petitioner
                                          Represented by: Mr. Priyadarshi Manish,
                                                          Advocate with Mr. Divyanshee
                                                          Singh, & Ms. Arjun Kaur,
                                                          Advocates.
                                               versus

                                 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                       ..... Respondent
                                          Represented by:        Ms. Pratima N., Lakra,
                                                                 Advocate for R-1.
                                                                 Mr. Aditya Singla, Senior
                                                                 Standing Counsel with
                                                                 Mr. Achin Sondhi & Mr.
                                                                 Yatharth Singh, Advocates for
                                                                 R-2 to R-8.
                                 CORAM:
                                 HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
                                 HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
                                         ORDER

% 22.03.2022 CM APPL. 10632/2022 (exemption from filing notarized affidavit)

1. Notarized affidavit be filed within one week.

2. Application is disposed of.

W.P.(C) 3614/2022

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to implead the Commissioner, State GST, Delhi as respondent No.9 and will file amended memo of parties within two weeks.

2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to release IGST to the petitioner for a sum of ₹78,29,825/- along with interest that has accrued thereon and the release of duty Signature Not Verified Signed By:JUSTICE MUKTA W.P.(C) 3614/2022 Page 1 of 2 GUPTA Signing Date:23.03.2022 19:22:35 drawback for a sum of ₹35,86,614/- and remove the alert against Importer-Exporter Code (in short, 'IEC') No.AAMCM0507D and GSTIN No.07AAMCM0507D1ZU, besides costs.

3. Notice. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and respondent Nos.2 to 8 accepts notice.

4. On the amended memo of parties be filed, notice be issued to the newly added respondent No.9, on the petitioner taking steps through Email, SMS, Whatsapp, speed post and courier, as also through the learned Standing Counsel, returnable before this Court on 15th July, 2022.

5. Reply affidavit, if any, be filed within four weeks.

6. Rejoinder affidavit in four weeks thereafter

7. List on 15th July, 2022.

8. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

MARCH 22, 2022 vk Signature Not Verified Signed By:JUSTICE MUKTA W.P.(C) 3614/2022 Page 2 of 2 GUPTA Signing Date:23.03.2022 19:22:35