Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Dharmender Kumar vs State Of U.P And Ors . on 3 February, 2016

Bench: J. Chelameswar, Abhay Manohar Sapre

       CHAMBER MATTER                                                        SECTION II

                                       S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                               RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                 R.P.(Crl.) No. 6/2016 In SLP(Crl) No. 4214/2015

       DHARMENDER KUMAR                                                    Petitioner(s)

                                                        VERSUS

       STATE OF U.P AND ORS .                                              Respondent(s)

       (with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing review petition and office
       report)

       Date : 03/02/2016 This petition was circulated today.

       CORAM :
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

                                            By Circulation

                                  UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                                                     O R D E R

Delay condoned.

The review petition is dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(DEEPAK MANSUKHANI) (INDU BALA KAPUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHOK RAJ SINGH Date: 2016.02.03 16:25:37 IST Reason: DSC of Sh. Ashok Raj Singh is being used by Sh. Deepak Mansukhani IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) NO(s). 6 OF 2016 IN SLP(CRL.) NO(s). 4214 OF 2015 DHARMENDER KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P AND ORS . Respondent(s) O R D E R Delay condoned.

We have considered the averments in the review petition. Having regard to the facts and issues involved, in our opinion, no case for review is made out. There is no error apparent on the face of record.

Hence, the Review Petition is dismissed.

......................J. (J. CHELAMESWAR) ......................J. (ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE) NEW DELHI FEBRUARY 03, 2016.