Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Krushnakantbhai Fuljibhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 4 June, 2014

Author: R.D.Kothari

Bench: R.D.Kothari

         R/SCR.A/2197/2014                                             ORDER




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 2197 of 2014

================================================================
           KRUSHNAKANTBHAI FULJIBHAI PATEL....Applicant(s)
                            Versus
                STATE OF GUJARAT....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR DM AHUJA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KP RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

         CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.D.KOTHARI

                                 Date : 04/06/2014


                                  ORAL ORDER

Heard learned Advocates for the parties.

2. The petitioner is Official Liquidator facing charge under Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioner challenges the order passed by the trial Court on 31.05.2014, whereby the trial Court has passed an order, in substance, delivering the custody of the petitioner to IO for 'Voice Spectrography Test' at FSL, Gandhinagar.

3. RULE. Learned APP Mr.K.P.Raval waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.



             With      consent,      the     petition       is   taken         up   for




                                     Page 1 of 2
           R/SCR.A/2197/2014                                       ORDER



final hearing.


4. Upon hearing learned Advocates for the parties, the order under challenge is modified. The petitioner shall cooperate the IO in investigation of ACB Police Station C.R. No.8 of 2014, including cooperation for 'Voice Spectrography Test' of the petitioner at FSL, Gandhinagar. Learned APP submits that IO would intimate in advance to the petitioner for the above test at FSL, Gandhinagar.

5. Learned Advocate for the petitioner undertakes to file an undertaking of the petitioner within one week from today to cooperate the IO.

6. On an undertaking given by the petitioner to cooperate the IO in 'Voice Spectrography Test', the order of trial Court of handing over custody of the petitioner to IO is hereby quashed and set aside.

7. Rule is made absolute to the above extent.

Direct service is permitted.

(R.D.KOTHARI, J.) SHITOLE Page 2 of 2