Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Aminur Islam @ Md. Aminul Islam And 3 Ors vs The State Of Assam on 1 October, 2020

Author: Parthivjyoti Saikia

Bench: Parthivjyoti Saikia

                                                                   Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010134642020




                       THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                        Case No. : Bail Appln. 1993/2020

         1:AMINUR ISLAM @ MD. AMINUL ISLAM AND 3 ORS.
         S/O LATE SHEIKH MAMUD, R/O VILL-NO. 2 BARSALA, P.O.-BARSALA, P.S.-
         NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST-LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN-783023

         2: SAIDUL HOQUE
          S/O LATE SHEIKH MAMUD
          R/O VILL-BANDERDEWA BALIGAON
          P.O.-MERBIL
          P.S.-BIHPURIA
          DIST-LAKHIMPUR (ASSAM)
          PIN-784160


         3: ANARUL HAQUE
          S/O HABIJUDDIN
          R/O VILL-BANDERDEWA BALIGAON
          P.O.-MERBIL
          P.S.-BIHPURIA
          DIST-LAKHIMPUR (ASSAM)
          PIN-784160


         4: KHULESA KHATOON @ MUSSTT PHULESHA KHATUN
         W/O ANARUL HAQUE
          R/O VILL-BANDERDEWA BALIGAON
          P.O.-MERBIL
          P.S.-BIHPURIA
          DIST-LAKHIMPUR (ASSAM)
          PIN-78416

         VERSUS

         1:THE STATE OF ASSAM
         REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM
                                                                                        Page No.# 2/2


Advocate for the Petitioner    : MR. J A AHMED

Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM




                                     BEFORE
                    HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

                                                ORDER

Date : 01-10-2020 Heard the learned counsel Mr. J. Ahmed, appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. H. Sarma, learned Addl. P.P. for the State of Assam.

Mr. Sarma has submitted that mandatory period of detention of this offence is 60 days and the said period has already lapse.

Considering the submission of Mr. Sarma, the petitioner is directed to approach the learned Trial Court seeking bail on the aforesaid ground.

The present application stands rejected and disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant