Chattisgarh High Court
Pradeep Sahni vs Municipal Corporation Of Raipur 35 ... on 15 May, 2018
Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 1320 of 2018
Hanuman Soni S/o Horilal Soni, aged about 24 years, R/o H. No. 24/93,
Ravishankar Shukla Nagar, Kukurbeda, Amanaka, Raipur, District Raipur
(C.G.) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal
Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development
Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents
WPC No. 1327 of 2018 Rupesh Kumar Kushwaha, S/o Rambali Kushwaha, aged about 27 years, R/o Kota, In front of Ram Darbar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents WPC No. 1331 of 2018 Shyam Bihari Kushwaha, S/o Parshuram Kushwaha, aged about 40 years, R/o H. No. 2/1793, Ram Mandir, Thakurpara, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents WPC No. 1332 of 2018 2 Prakash Sahu, S/o Pardeshiram Sahu, aged about 28 years, R/o H. No. 51/2126, Near Hanuman Mandir, Ravishankar University, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents WPC No. 1334 of 2018 Dipak Mandal S/o Sapan Mandal, aged about 28 years, R/o Ward No 12, Jyoti Nagar, Kota, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents WPC No. 1335 of 2018 Uyadav Bahadur Karki S/o Late Bhakt Karki, aged about 40 years, R/o H. No. 4/D, Street NO. 8, Sector -8, Bhilai, Civic Centre, Bhilai, Durg (C.G.)
---- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents WPC No. 1339 of 2018 Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Pardeshi Sahu, aged about 30 years, R/o Kukurbeda, Badapara, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.) 3
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents WPC No. 1341 of 2018 Shankar Nishad S/o Agnu Nishad, aged about 40 years, R/o 743, Masjid Road, Ward No. 12, Ravishankar University, Kota, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents WPC No. 1343 of 2018 Udaybhan Kushwaha S/o Suryabali Kushwaha, aged about 35 years, R/o Village Manjhigawan, P.O. Manjhigawan, Semariya, Distrit Rewa (M.P.)
---- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents And WPC No. 1344 of 2018 Pradeep Sahni S/o Aday Sahni, aged about 45 years, R/o H. No. 197, Near Shitla Mandir, Mohawa Bazar, Heerapur Road, Dumar Talab, District Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner Versus
1. Municipal Corporation of Raipur through its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Raipur (C.G.)
2. Secretary, Department of Urban Administration and Development Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Rajni Soren, Advocate.
4For Respondents : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondents/ State : Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 15/05/18
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submit that petitioners are the street vendors but their street vending identity cards have not been issued by the respondent - Municipal Corporation, Raipur and, therefore, the said authority be directed to issue vending identity cards to the petitioners.
2. Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Municipal Corporation would submit that petitioners' cases will be considered and appropriate action will be taken in accordance with the provisions of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vendor) Act, 2014 (for brevity, 'Act of 2014').
3. In view of the aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the Corporation, the writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the Municipal Corporation, Raipur to strictly follow the provisions of the Act of 2014 to issue street vending identity cards to the petitioners expeditiously preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka