Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Gujarat Contractors Association & Anr vs Employees State Insurance on 20 January, 2016

Author: Paresh Upadhyay

Bench: Paresh Upadhyay

                 C/SCA/18467/2015                                               ORDER




                IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 18467 of 2015

         =============================================
              GUJARAT CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION & ANR....Petitioners
                   Versus
              EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE
              CORPORATION & ANR                ....Respondents
         =============================================
         Appearance:
         MR DIPAK R DAVE, ADVOCATE for the Petitioners
         MR HEMANT S SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondents No. 1 -2
         =========================================

                    CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY

                                    Date : 20/01/2016

                                        ORAL ORDER

1. Heard Mr.Dipak R. Dave, learned advocate for the petitioners and Mr.Hemant S. Shah, learned advocate for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.

2. Challenge in this petition is made to the Circular of the respondent Authorities dated 31.07.2015 (Annexure-A) regarding extension of the ESI Scheme to construction site workers.

3. Learned advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the challenge to this very Circular is entertained by the Madras High Court and the petitioner there is protected. Attention of this Court is invited to Annexure-C which is the copy of the order passed by the Madras High Court dated 21.09.2015. It is submitted that, the present petitioner is similarly situated.

4. Affidavit in reply is filed on behalf of the respondents. So Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu Jan 21 02:13:09 IST 2016 C/SCA/18467/2015 ORDER far the above noted factual aspect is concerned, it has remained uncontroverted.

5. In view of above, the following order is passed.

6. Rule. It is ordered that, during the pendency of this petition, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned Circular.

(PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) M O Bhati/22 Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Thu Jan 21 02:13:09 IST 2016